Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32036495›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2020

Single-port robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with magnetic retraction: first experience using the SP da Vinci platform.

Vishnu Ganesan, Ramy Goueli, Dayron Rodriguez, Deborah Hess, Maude Carmel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Systematic Review and Clinical Outcomes of new Robotic Systems in Urology.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2023
    Article
  9. Robotic Magnetic Surgery: Results From the First Prospective Clinical Trial.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vishnu GanesanDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75390-9110, USA.
Ramy GoueliDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75390-9110, USA.
Dayron RodriguezDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75390-9110, USA.
Deborah HessDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75390-9110, USA.
Maude CarmelDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75390-9110, USA. maude.carmel@utsouthwestern.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1495-0448

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe technical considerations and first outcomes from a single-port robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy (RSC) using the da Vinci SP platform (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA) and the Levita™ Magnetic Surgical System (San Mateo, CA, USA), a novel magnetic retraction system. Three females with pelvic organ prolapse elected to undergo RSC using the da Vinci SP platform. The supraumbilical incision length was 25 mm through which SP trocar was placed. A 12-mm assistant port was placed in the right upper quadrant. The external magnet was attached to the left side of the bed and used for bowel and bladder retraction. We then proceeded by duplicating the steps of our approach for a RSC performed using a multi-port robotic platform with necessary modifications given the SP approach. Intra-operative outcomes and peri-operative outcomes were collected and reported. The patients were women of 64, 66 and 73 years of age with BMI of 22, 25, and 34, respectively, and POP-Q stage III and IV prolapse. The RSC was performed between 198 and 247 min, estimated blood loss was 10-50 cc, and there were no complications. All patients were discharged home on post-operative day 1. All patients were doing well 1 month out with resolution of bulge symptoms. To our knowledge, this represents the first case series of robotic, magnetic-assisted sacrocolpopexies using the da Vinci SP platform and the Levita™ Magnetic Surgical System. It appears to be a safe and feasible approach, but long-term comparative studies will be necessary to assess functional outcomes.

Indexed as

AgedBlood Loss, SurgicalFemaleGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHumansLaparoscopyMagneticsMiddle AgedOperative TimePelvic Organ ProlapseRobotic Surgical ProceduresTreatment OutcomeRobotic assistedSacrocolpopexySingle port

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.