Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32036492›Full record

Trial reportGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2020

Randomized phase II/III study of 5-fluorouracil/l-leucovorin versus 5-fluorouracil/l-leucovorin plus paclitaxel administered to patients with severe peritoneal metastases of gastric cancer (JCOG1108/WJOG7312G).

Takako Eguchi Nakajima, Kensei Yamaguchi, Narikazu Boku, Ichinosuke Hyodo, Junki Mizusawa, Hiroki Hara, Tomohiro Nishina, Takeshi Sakamoto, Kohei Shitara, Katsunori Shinozaki and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Catheter based intraperitoneal chemotherapy using taxane for peritoneal metastases from gastric cancer: from bench to bedside-a narrative review.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Review
  10. Phase II study of mFOLFOX6 in advanced gastric cancer patients with severe peritoneal metastases (WJOG10517G), including an individual patient data comparison with JCOG1108/WJOG7312G.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Takako Eguchi NakajimaDepartment of Clinical Oncology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan. tnakajima@marianna-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-4589-2335
Kensei YamaguchiDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Narikazu BokuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Ichinosuke HyodoDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Junki MizusawaJapan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) Data Center/Operations Office, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroki HaraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan.
Tomohiro NishinaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Japan.
Takeshi SakamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hyogo Cancer Center, Akashi, Japan.
Kohei ShitaraGastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Katsunori ShinozakiDivision of Clinical Oncology, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Hiroshi KatayamaJapan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) Data Center/Operations Office, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Shinichiro NakamuraWest Japan Oncology Group (WJOG) Data Center Division, Yokohama, Japan.
Kei MuroDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan.
Masanori TerashimaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Nagaizumi, Japan.
Japan Clinical Cancer Research Organization · JPNational Cancer Center Hospital East · JPAichi Cancer Center · JPHiroshima Prefectural Hospital · JPHyogo Prefectural Cancer Center · JPSaitama Cancer Center · JPShikoku Cancer Center · JPShizuoka Cancer Center · JPSt. Marianna University School of Medicine · JPThe Cancer Institute Hospital · JPUniversity of Tsukuba · JP

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development JP16ck0106139Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development JP18ck0106351The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan Grant-in-Aid for Clinical Cancer Research (H26-144)The National Cancer Research and Development Fund 26-A-4The National Cancer Research and Development Fund 29-A-3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOral fluoropyrimidine plus cisplatin is often not tolerated by patients with severe peritoneal metastases of gastric cancer. Combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), l-leucovorin (l-LV), and paclitaxel (FLTAX) has promising activity for such patients. We conducted a phase II/III study comparing FLTAX with 5-FU/l-LV.

methodsEligibility criteria included: unresectable or recurrent gastric adenocarcinoma; 20-75 years; performance status (PS) 0-2; peritoneal metastases + ; massive ascites and/or inadequate oral intake; no prior chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 5-FU/l-LV or FLTAX. The primary endpoint of phase III was overall survival: UMIN000010949.

resultsWe enrolled 101 patients. Early deaths occurred in patients with PS 2 having massive ascites and inadequate oral intake simultaneously; the protocol was amended to exclude such patients. Median survival times were 6.1 and 7.3 months for the 5-FU/l-LV and the FLTAX arms, respectively (HR 0.792; 80% CI 0.596-1.053; one-sided p = 0.1445). FLTAX arm had longer progression-free survival (PFS) [1.9 vs 5.4 months (HR 0.64; 95% CI, 0.43-0.96; p = 0.029)]. Grade 3/4 adverse events such as leucopenia and anorexia were more frequently observed in the 5-FU/l-LV arm. In the 5-FU/l-LV arm, two deaths were treatment-related. In the 5-FU/l-LV and FLTAX arms, 12 and 3 deaths occurred within 30 days after the last protocol treatment, respectively.

conclusionsChemotherapy was indicated for patients with severe peritoneal metastases excluding patients with PS 2 having massive ascites and inadequate oral intake simultaneously. FLTAX did not confer a significant survival benefit but may be preferred because of longer PFS and acceptable toxicity.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFemaleFluorouracilFollow-Up StudiesHumansLeucovorinMaleMiddle AgedPaclitaxelPeritoneal NeoplasmsPrognosisStomach NeoplasmsSurvival RateFluorouracilLeucovorinPaclitaxel

Identifiers

PMID32036492
OpenAlexW3005381361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.