Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32036466›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2020

Bacterial vaginosis-associated vaginal microbiota is an age-independent risk factor for Chlamydia trachomatis, Mycoplasma genitalium and Trichomonas vaginalis infections in low-risk women, St. Petersburg, Russia.

Elena Shipitsyna, Tatiana Khusnutdinova, Olga Budilovskaya, Anna Krysanova, Kira Shalepo, Alevtina Savicheva, Magnus Unemo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Gut-Vagina Axis.Microorganisms · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. mSystems · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Current infectious disease reports · 2023
    Article
  18. Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Research Progress on the Correlation BetweenFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elena ShipitsynaLaboratory of Microbiology, D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2309-3604
Tatiana KhusnutdinovaLaboratory of Microbiology, D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2742-2655
Olga BudilovskayaLaboratory of Microbiology, D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7673-6274
Anna KrysanovaLaboratory of Microbiology, D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4798-1881
Kira ShalepoLaboratory of Microbiology, D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3002-3874
Alevtina SavichevaLaboratory of Microbiology, D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3870-5930
Magnus UnemoWHO Collaborating Centre for Gonorrhoea and Other STIs, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, SE-701 82, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden. magnus.unemo@regionorebrolan.se.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1710-2081

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation AAAA-A19-119-021290030-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The large majority of studies investigating associations between bacterial vaginosis (BV) and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) have been conducted among predominantly young women with high risk for STIs. Since a risky sexual behavior is a significant risk factor for both STIs and BV, this creates a bias toward an increased association between BV and STIs. This study evaluated associations between BV-associated vaginal microbiota and STIs (Chlamydia trachomatis, Mycoplasma genitalium, Trichomonas vaginalis, and Neisseria gonorrhoeae) in a population of women with low risk for STIs and investigated STI outcomes depending on the dominating Lactobacillus species. Repository cervicovaginal samples collected from reproductive-age women from January 2014 to February 2019 were characterized for vaginal microbiota types and the STIs using multiplex real-time PCR assays. In total, 95 STI-positive and 91 STI-negative samples were included. A significant, age-independent association between BV-associated vaginal microbiota and the presence of C. trachomatis, M. genitalium, and T. vaginalis infections was identified (age-adjusted odds ratios 2.92 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24-7.03], 2.88 [95% CI 1.19-7.16], and 9.75 × 10

Indexed as

MicrobiotaAdultCase-Control StudiesChlamydia trachomatisFemaleHumansLactobacillusMiddle AgedMycoplasma genitaliumNeisseria gonorrhoeaeRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsRussiaSexually Transmitted DiseasesTrichomonas vaginalisVaginaBacterial vaginosisChlamydia trachomatisLow-risk womenMycoplasma genitaliumSexually transmitted infectionsTrichomonas vaginalis

Identifiers

PMID32036466
PMCPMC7303053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.