Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32036446›Full record

ArticleDevelopment genes and evolution2020

Candidate gene screen for potential interaction partners and regulatory targets of the Hox gene labial in the spider Parasteatoda tepidariorum.

Christoph Schomburg, Natascha Turetzek, Nikola-Michael Prpic

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Development genes and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christoph SchomburgInstitut für Allgemeine Zoologie und Entwicklungsbiologie, AG Zoologie mit dem Schwerpunkt Molekulare Entwicklungsbiologie, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 38, 35392, Gießen, Germany.
Natascha TuretzekLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Lehrstuhl für Evolutionäre Ökologie, Biozentrum II, Großhadernerstraße 2, 82152, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.
Nikola-Michael PrpicInstitut für Allgemeine Zoologie und Entwicklungsbiologie, AG Zoologie mit dem Schwerpunkt Molekulare Entwicklungsbiologie, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 38, 35392, Gießen, Germany. nikola-michael.prpic-schaeper@allzool.bio.uni-giessen.de.ORCID 0000-0002-0027-2175
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft PR1109/4-1, PR1109/6-1 and PR1109/7-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Hox gene labial (lab) governs the formation of the tritocerebral head segment in insects and spiders. However, the morphology that results from lab action is very different in the two groups. In insects, the tritocerebral segment (intercalary segment) is reduced and lacks appendages, whereas in spiders the corresponding segment (pedipalpal segment) is a proper segment including a pair of appendages (pedipalps). It is likely that this difference between lab action in insects and spiders is mediated by regulatory targets or interacting partners of lab. However, only a few such genes are known in insects and none in spiders. We have conducted a candidate gene screen in the spider Parasteatoda tepidariorum using as candidates Drosophila melanogaster genes known to (potentially) interact with lab or to be expressed in the intercalary segment. We have studied 75 P. tepidariorum genes (including previously published and duplicated genes). Only 3 of these (proboscipedia-A (pb-A) and two paralogs of extradenticle (exd)) showed differential expression between leg and pedipalp. The low success rate points to a weakness of the candidate gene approach when it is applied to lineage specific organs. The spider pedipalp has no counterpart in insects, and therefore relying on insect data apparently cannot identify larger numbers of factors implicated in its specification and formation. We argue that in these cases a de novo approach to gene discovery might be superior to the candidate gene approach.

Indexed as

Genes, HomeoboxAnimalsArthropod ProteinsBody PatterningDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEmbryo, NonmammalianExtremitiesGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHeadHomeodomain ProteinsIn Situ HybridizationNervous SystemProtein BindingSpidersArthropod ProteinsDrosophila ProteinsHomeodomain Proteinslab protein, DrosophilaArthropod head evolutionHead segmentationHox geneLabialTritocerebral segment

Identifiers

PMID32036446
PMCPMC7128011
OpenAlexW3004848851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.