Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32036303›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2020

Striatal reactivity to reward under threat-of-shock and working memory load in adults at increased familial risk for major depression: A preliminary study.

Claudie Gaillard, Matthias Guillod, Monique Ernst, Andrea Federspiel, Dominik Schoebi, Romina Evelyn Recabarren, Xinyi Ouyang, Christoph Mueller-Pfeiffer, Antje Horsch, Philipp Homan and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Neural Circuitry of Reward During Sustained Threat.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Claudie GaillardIReach Lab, Unit of Clinical and Health Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland; Section on Neurobiology of Fear and Anxiety, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. Electronic address: claudie.gaillard@nih.gov.
Matthias GuillodIReach Lab, Unit of Clinical and Health Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Monique ErnstSection on Neurobiology of Fear and Anxiety, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Andrea FederspielPsychiatric Neuroimaging Unit, Translational Research Center, University Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Dominik SchoebiUnit of Clinical Family Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Romina Evelyn RecabarrenIReach Lab, Unit of Clinical and Health Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Xinyi OuyangiBM Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Christoph Mueller-PfeifferDepartment of Consultation-Liaison-Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Antje HorschDepartment Woman-Mother-Child, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland; Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Philipp HomanCenter for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, New York, New York, USA.
Roland WiestDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Gregor HaslerUnit of Psychiatry Research, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Chantal Martin-SoelchIReach Lab, Unit of Clinical and Health Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
University of Fribourg · CHFeinstein Institute for Medical Research · USNational Institute of Mental Health · USUniversity Hospital of Bern · CHUniversity of Bern · CHUniversity of Lausanne · CHUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAnhedonia, a core symptom of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), manifests as a lack or loss of motivation as reflected by decreased reward responsiveness, at both behavioral and neural (i.e., striatum) levels. Exposure to stressful life events is another important risk factor for MDD. However, the mechanisms linking reward-deficit and stress to MDD remain poorly understood. Here, we explore whether the effects of stress exposure on reward processing might differentiate between Healthy Vulnerable adults (HVul, i.e., positive familial MDD) from Healthy Controls (HCon). Furthermore, the well-described reduction in cognitive resources in MDD might facilitate the stress-induced decrease in reward responsiveness in HVul individuals. Accordingly, this study includes a manipulation of cognitive resources to address the latter possibility.

methods16 HVul (12 females) and 16 gender- and age-matched HCon completed an fMRI study, during which they performed a working memory reward task. Three factors were manipulated: reward (reward, no-reward), cognitive resources (working memory at low and high load), and stress level (no-shock, unpredictable threat-of-shock). Only the reward anticipation phase was analyzed. Imaging analyses focused on striatal function.

resultsCompared to HCon, HVul showed lower activation in the caudate nucleus across all conditions. The HVul group also exhibited lower stress-related activation in the nucleus accumbens, but only in the low working memory (WM) load condition. Moreover, while stress potentiated putamen reactivity to reward cues in HVul when the task was more demanding (high WM load), stress blunted putamen reactivity in both groups when no reward was at stake.

conclusionFindings suggest that HVul might be at increased risk of developing anhedonic symptoms due to weaker encoding of reward value, higher difficulty to engage in goal-oriented behaviors and increased sensitivity to negative feedback, particularly in stressful contexts. These findings open new avenues for a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying how the complex interaction between the systems of stress and reward responsiveness contribute to the vulnerability to MDD, and how cognitive resources might modulate this interaction.

Indexed as

AdultAnhedoniaBrain MappingCorpus StriatumFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMemory, Short-TermRewardStress, PsychologicalYoung AdultfMRIMajor depressive disorderRewardStressStriatumVulnerability

Identifiers

PMID32036303
PMCPMC7011085
OpenAlexW3001760096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.