ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2020
Use of Spiked Normalizers to More Precisely Quantify Tumor Markers and Viral Genomes by Massive Parallel Sequencing of Plasma DNA.
Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- ALFAssay: A feed‑forward neural network for quantitative fragmentomics‑based ctDNA profiling in breast cancer.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Calibration of cell-free DNA measurements by next-generation sequencing.American journal of clinical pathology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A problematic aspect of massive parallel sequencing is that somatic mutations and viral loads are typically quantified as a fraction relative to wild-type human DNA, yet wild-type levels vary with diverse biologic and preanalytic interferences. A novel strategy was devised to quantify target analytes in copies per mL of plasma after normalizing for read counts of spiked DNAs. Five synthetic DNAs (called EndoGenus spikes) were added to plasma before library preparation (modified ArcherDX LiquidPlex 28). By normalizing to the fractional recovery of EndoGenus spike reads, numerical values for each disease marker were reportable in units of copies per mL. To show how well this system operates, replicate assays were performed on 40 mock plasmas having 23 engineered mutations and on 21 natural plasmas. Reads for all five EndoGenus spikes were recovered (means, 313 and 376 copies/mL in mock and natural plasmas, respectively). Normalizing read counts for the proportional recovery of spikes helped control for variables in the multistep protocol, reducing the CV in replicate tests from 34% to 22% for mutations and from 25% to 7% for viral loads. In conclusion, the EndoGenus system is useful for evaluating efficiency of the total test system and for precisely quantifying target molecules. This system may benefit patients being monitored for disease burden while also tracking emerging subclones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.