Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32035868›Full record

ArticleBehavioural brain research2020

Brain activity underlying American crow processing of encounters with dead conspecifics.

Kaeli N Swift, John M Marzluff, Christopher N Templeton, Toru Shimizu, Donna J Cross

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural brain research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kaeli N SwiftSchool of Environmental and Forest Sciences, Seattle, WA, United States. Electronic address: kaelis@uw.edu.
John M MarzluffSchool of Environmental and Forest Sciences, Seattle, WA, United States.
Christopher N TempletonDepartment of Biology, Pacific University Oregon, Forest Grove, OR, United States.
Toru ShimizuDepartment of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States.
Donna J CrossDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
Pacific University Oregon · USUniversity of South Florida · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Small Animal CT SystemS10OD017980 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MIYAOKA, ROBERT S · 2014 to 2014
$547k
Small Animal PET SystemS10RR024689 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MIYAOKA, ROBERT S · 2008 to 2008
$500k
NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR024689NIH HHS S10 OD017980
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals utilize a variety of auditory and visual cues to navigate the landscape of fear. For some species, including corvids, dead conspecifics appear to act as one such visual cue of danger, and prompt alarm calling by attending conspecifics. Which brain regions mediate responses to dead conspecifics, and how this compares to other threats, has so far only been speculative. Using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) we contrast the metabolic response to visual and auditory cues associated with a dead conspecific among five a priori selected regions in the American crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos) brain: the hippocampus, nidopallium caudolaterale, striatum, amygdala, and the septum. Using a repeated-measures, fully balanced approach, we exposed crows to four stimuli: a dead conspecific, a dead song sparrow (Melospiza melodia), conspecific alarm calls given in response to a dead crow, and conspecific food begging calls. We find that in response to observations of a dead crow, crows show significant activity in areas associated with higher-order decision-making (NCL), but not in areas associated with social behaviors or fear learning. We do not find strong differences in activation between hearing alarm calls and food begging calls; both activate the NCL. Lastly, repeated exposures to negative stimuli had a marginal effect on later increasing the subjects' brain activity in response to control stimuli, suggesting that crows might quickly learn from negative experiences.

Indexed as

DeathSocial BehaviorVocalization, AnimalAcoustic StimulationAmygdalaAnimalsBrainCorpus StriatumCrowsDecision MakingFearFluorodeoxyglucose F18Functional NeuroimagingHippocampusLearningPhotic StimulationFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsAmerican crowComparative thanatologyDead conspecific[F-18]fluorodeoxyglucose–PET imagingFunctional neuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID32035868
PMCPMC9384862
OpenAlexW2974691444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.