Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32035854›Full record

Trial reportJournal of surgical education

Randomized Trial of a Virtual Reality Tool to Teach Surgical Technique for Tibial Shaft Fracture Intramedullary Nailing.

Gideon Blumstein, Brian Zukotynski, Nicolas Cevallos, Chad Ishmael, Steven Zoller, Zach Burke, Samuel Clarkson, Howard Park, Nicholas Bernthal, Nelson F SooHoo

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of surgical education. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07515092 (Virtual Reality-Based Simulation Training for Antegrade Anterior Column Acetabular Screw Placement in Orthopedic Residents), which is not on this map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07515092 naenrolling by invitationnot on this map

Virtual Reality-Based Simulation Training for Antegrade Anterior Column Acetabular Screw Placement in Orthopedic Residents: A Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBangkok Metropolitan Administration Medical College and Vajira HospitalRan2026 to 2027Enrolled20ConditionsVirtual Reality SimulationArmsVirtual reality based simulation training, Standard Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 123 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Evaluation of a Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis Virtual Reality Surgical Simulation for the Orthopaedic Trainee.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2022
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gideon BlumsteinDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California. Electronic address: gblumstein@mednet.ucla.edu.
Brian ZukotynskiDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
Nicolas CevallosDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
Chad IshmaelDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
Steven ZollerDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
Zach BurkeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
Samuel ClarksonDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
Howard ParkDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
Nicholas BernthalDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
Nelson F SooHooDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
University of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Regenerative Musculoskeletal Medicine Training ProgramT32AR059033 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI John S Adams, Nicholas M. Bernthal · 2011 to 2026
$4.8M
NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR059033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionActive learning methods have accumulated popularity due to improved results in knowledge acquisition as opposed to passive learning methods. For surgical resident physicians with limited training opportunities outside of the operating room due to time constraints, virtual reality (VR) is a relatively inexpensive and time-efficient active training method for procurement of surgical skills. We conducted a simulated intramedullary nailing (IMN) of a tibia to demonstrate VR training programs as a more effective modality of learning orthopedic surgical techniques compared to passive learning tools such as a standard guide (SG) through trained novice medical students performing a SawBones simulation of intramedullary nail fixation. MATERIALS AND

methodsFirst and second-year medical students without prior experience of procedure were recruited and randomized to SG or VR training. Participants were observed performing simulated tibia IMN procedure immediately after training and evaluated by a blinded attending surgeon using procedure-specific checklist and 5-point global assessment scale. Participants returned after 2-weeks for repeat training and evaluation.

results20 participants were recruited and randomized into VR (n = 10) and SG (n = 10) groups. All 20 participants completed the first phase and 17 completed the second phase of the study. Aggregate global assessment scores were significantly higher for VR than SG group (17.5 vs. 7.5, p < 0.001), including scores in all individual categories. The percentage of steps completed correctly was significantly higher in the VR group compared to the SG group (63% vs. 25%, p < 0.002). Average improvement between the first and second phases of the study were higher in the VR group compared to SG group across all 5-categories of the global assessment scale, and significantly higher for knowledge of instruments (50% vs. 11%, p, 0.01). DISCUSSION: VR training was more effective than a passive SG in our model of simulated tibia IMN for novice medical students. Virtual reality training may be a useful method to augment orthopedic education.

Indexed as

Fracture Fixation, IntramedullarySimulation TrainingVirtual RealityClinical CompetenceHumansTibiafeedbackpracticesimulationstudent educationtrainingvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID32035854
PMCPMC7351249
OpenAlexW3004632017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.