Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32035793›Full record

ReviewEpilepsy & behavior : E&B2021

The cerebellum and epilepsy.

Martha L Streng, Esther Krook-Magnuson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Epilepsy & behavior : E&B, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06558890 (A Study on the Efficacy and Mechanism of Targeted Cerebellar Transcranial Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Refractory Temporal Lobe Epilepsy), which is not on this map. Cited by 68 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06558890 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Study on the Efficacy and Mechanism of Targeted Cerebellar Transcranial Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Refractory Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: A Single-center, Observational Study.

TypeinterventionalSponsorXijing HospitalRan2024 to 2024Enrolled60ConditionsTranscranial Electrical Stimulation, Temporal Lobe Epilepsy, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, ElectroencephalogramArmsTranscranial Alternating Current Stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Antiseizure Networks.Epilepsy currents · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Frontiers in medicine · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. The Neuroimmunology of Autism.Molecular neurobiology · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Martha L StrengDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Electronic address: stren021@umn.edu.
Esther Krook-MagnusonDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

Hippobellum: Cerebellar influence on the hippocampus and temporal lobe seizuresR01NS112518 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Esther Krook-Magnuson · 2020 to 2026
$3.4M
A novel inhibitory target for temporal lobe epilepsyR01NS104071 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI KROOK-MAGNUSON, ESTHER · 2018 to 2022
$1.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS104071NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS112518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epilepsy is the fourth most common neurological disorder, but current treatment options provide limited efficacy and carry the potential for problematic adverse effects. There is an immense need to develop new therapeutic interventions in epilepsy, and targeting areas outside the seizure focus for neuromodulation has shown therapeutic value. While not traditionally associated with epilepsy, anatomical, clinical, and electrophysiological studies suggest the cerebellum can play a role in seizure networks, and importantly, may be a potential therapeutic target for seizure control. However, previous interventions targeting the cerebellum in both preclinical and clinical studies have produced mixed effects on seizures. These inconsistent results may be due in part to the lack of specificity inherent with open-loop electrical stimulation interventions. More recent studies, using more targeted closed-loop optogenetic approaches, suggest the possibility of robust seizure inhibition via cerebellar modulation for a range of seizure types. Therefore, while the mechanisms of cerebellar inhibition of seizures have yet to be fully elucidated, the cerebellum should be thoroughly revisited as a potential target for therapeutic intervention in epilepsy. This article is part of the Special Issue "NEWroscience 2018.

Indexed as

Deep Brain StimulationEpilepsyCerebellumElectric StimulationHumansSeizuresChannelrhodopsinDeep brain stimulationFastigial nucleusHalorhodopsinTemporal lobe epilepsyThalamus

Identifiers

PMID32035793
PMCPMC7415499
OpenAlexW3005257798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.