Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32035643›Full record

ReviewClinical therapeutics2020

Innovations in HIV-1 Vaccine Design.

Letitia D Jones, M Anthony Moody, Amelia B Thompson

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical therapeutics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. mRNA-based HIV-1 vaccines.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Design of a native-like secreted form of the hepatitis C virus E1E2 heterodimer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  20. mRNA-based vaccine technology for HIV.Discoveries (Craiova, Romania)
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Letitia D JonesDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
M Anthony MoodyDuke University School of Medicine and Duke Human Vaccine Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
Amelia B ThompsonDuke University School of Medicine and Duke Human Vaccine Institute, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: amelia.thompson@duke.edu.
Duke University · US

Funding

Nonhuman primate studies for development of a prototype HIV vaccine that induces broadly neutralizing antibodiesUM1AI144371 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HAYNES, BARTON F. · 2019 to 2025
$190.4M
Social and Behavioral Sciences CoreP30AI064518 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GEORGIA Doris TOMARAS · 2005 to 2026
$50.5M
Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award (NRSA)- T32T32AI007392 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Amy Lynn Corneli, Guido Ferrari · 1990 to 2026
$9.8M
Safety and Durability of Integrase Defective Lentiviral vector for an HIV VaccineP01AI110485 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI KLOTMAN, MARY E. · 2015 to 2019
$9.0M
NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI110485NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI064518NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007392NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI144371
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe field of HIV-1 vaccinology has evolved during the last 30 years from the first viral vector HIV gene insert constructs to vaccination regimens using a myriad of strategies. These strategies now include germline-targeting, lineage-based, and structure-guided immunogen design. This narrative review outlines the historical context of HIV vaccinology and subsequently highlights the scientific discoveries during the last 6 years that promise to propel the field forward.

methodsWe conducted a search of 2 electronic databases, PubMed and EMBASE, for experimental studies that involved new HIV immunogen designs between 2013 and 2019. During the title and abstract reviews, publications were excluded if they were written in language other than English and/or were a letter to the editor, a commentary, or a conference-only presentation. We then used ClinicalTrials.gov to identify completed and ongoing clinical trials using these strategies.

findingsThe HIV vaccinology field has undergone periods of significant growth during the last 3 decades. Findings elucidated in preclinical studies have revealed the importance of the interaction between the cellular and humoral immune system. As a result, several new rationally designed vaccine strategies have been developed and explored in the last 6 years, including native-like envelope trimers, nanoparticle, and mRNA vaccine design strategies among others. Several of these strategies have shown enough promise in animal models to progress toward first-in-human Phase I clinical trials. IMPLICATIONS: Rapid developments in preclinical and early-phase clinical studies suggest that a tolerable and effective HIV vaccine may be on the horizon.

Indexed as

AIDS VaccinesHIV InfectionsAnimalsClinical Trials as TopicHumansAIDS VaccinesbNAbHIV vaccineimmune correlatesimmunogen

Identifiers

PMID32035643
PMCPMC7102617
OpenAlexW3004717226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.