Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32035487›Full record

Trial reportCardiovascular diabetology2020

Effect of alirocumab on individuals with type 2 diabetes, high triglycerides, and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Helen M Colhoun, Lawrence A Leiter, Dirk Müller-Wieland, Bertrand Cariou, Kausik K Ray, Francisco J Tinahones, Catherine Domenger, Alexia Letierce, Marc Israel, Rita Samuel and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldFull text readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cardiovascular diabetology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It reports registered trial NCT02642159. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02642159 phase4completed

A Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Alirocumab Versus Usual Care in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Mixed Dyslipidemia at High Cardiovascular Risk With Non-HDL-C Not Adequately Controlled With Maximally Tolerated Statin Therapy

Ran2016Enrolled413Registered outcomes23Posted comparisons16ConditionsDyslipidemiaArmsAlirocumab, Antihyperglycemic Drug, Ezetimibe, Fenofibrate, Nicotinic Acid
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 7 countries.

Helen M ColhounThe Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK. helen.colhoun@igmm.ed.ac.uk.
Lawrence A LeiterLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Dirk Müller-WielandDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Bertrand Carioul'institut du thorax, CHU Nantes, INSERM, CNRS, UNIV Nantes, Nantes, France.
Kausik K RayImperial Centre for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College, London, UK.
Francisco J TinahonesDepartment of Clinical Endocrinology and Nutrition (IBIMA), Hospital Virgen de la Victoria, University of Málaga, CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERobn), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Málaga, Spain.
Catherine DomengerSanofi, Gentilly, France.
Alexia LetierceBiostatistics and Programming Department, Sanofi, Chilly-Mazarin, France.
Marc IsraelRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Tarrytown, NY, USA.
Rita SamuelRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Tarrytown, NY, USA.
Stefano Del PratoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Regeneron (United States) · USSanofi (France) · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRImperial College London · GBUniversidad de Málaga · ESUniversitätsklinikum Aachen · DEUniversity of Pisa · ITUniversity of Toronto · CAWestern General Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMixed dyslipidemia [elevated non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) and triglycerides (TGs), and decreased HDL-C] is common in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and is associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Non-HDL-C and apolipoprotein B (ApoB) are the preferred therapeutic targets for mixed dyslipidemia. Alirocumab is a monoclonal antibody to proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) that effectively reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), non-HDL-C, ApoB, and lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]), and is well-tolerated in individuals with T2DM.

methodsThe previously reported open-label ODYSSEY DM-DYSLIPIDEMIA trial data demonstrated the effects of alirocumab on individuals with non-HDL-C ≥ 100 mg/dL and TGs ≥ 150 and < 500 mg/dL receiving stable maximally tolerated statin (n = 413). This post hoc subgroup analysis of the primary trial investigated the effects of alirocumab [75 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) with possible increase to 150 mg Q2W at Week 12] versus usual care [ezetimibe, fenofibrate, or no additional lipid-lowering therapy (LLT)] on non-HDL-C and other lipids in individuals with T2DM and baseline TGs ≥ 200 mg/dL and HDL-C < 40 mg/dL (men) or < 50 mg/dL (women).

resultsAlirocumab significantly reduced non-HDL-C [LS mean difference (standard error (SE)), - 35.0% (3.9)], ApoB [LS mean difference (SE), - 34.7% (3.6)], LDL-C [LS mean difference (SE), - 47.3% (5.2)], LDL particle number [LS mean difference (SE), - 40.8% (4.1)], and Lp(a) [LS mean difference (SE), - 29.9% (5.4)] versus usual care from baseline to Week 24 (all P < 0.0001). Results were similar for alirocumab versus usual care. TG reductions were similar between alirocumab and usual care (no significant difference), but greater with fenofibrate versus alirocumab (P = 0.3371). Overall, alirocumab significantly increased HDL-C versus usual care [LS mean difference (SE), 7.9% (3.6); P < 0.05], although differences with alirocumab versus ezetimibe or fenofibrate were non-significant. Most individuals receiving alirocumab achieved ApoB < 80 mg/dL (67.9%) and non-HDL-C < 100 mg/dL (60.9%). Adverse event frequency was similar between alirocumab (67.2%) and usual care (70.7%). Additionally, no clinically relevant effect of alirocumab on change in glycemic parameters or use of antihyperglycemic agents was observed.

conclusionsAlirocumab is an effective therapeutic option for individuals with T2DM, TGs ≥ 200 mg/dL, and HDL-C < 40 mg/dL (men) or < 50 mg/dL (women). Atherogenic lipid (ApoB and non-HDL) reductions were greater with alirocumab than ezetimibe, fenofibrate, or no LLT. Consistent with previous studies, alirocumab was generally well tolerated. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02642159. Registered December 24, 2015, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02642159.

Indexed as

PCSK9 InhibitorsAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAnticholesteremic AgentsBiomarkersCholesterol, HDLDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2DyslipidemiasFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProprotein Convertase 9Protease InhibitorsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomealirocumabAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAnticholesteremic AgentsBiomarkersCholesterol, HDLPCSK9 InhibitorsPCSK9 protein, humanProprotein Convertase 9Protease InhibitorsTriglyceridesAlirocumabDiabetes mellitusDM-DYSLIPIDEMIAHDL-CNon-HDL-CODYSSEYPCSK9TriglyceridesType 2 diabetesUsual care

Identifiers

PMID32035487
PMCPMC7007683
OpenAlexW3005065383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.