Trial reportCardiovascular diabetology2020
Effect of alirocumab on individuals with type 2 diabetes, high triglycerides, and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
Trial report in Cardiovascular diabetology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It reports registered trial NCT02642159. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Alirocumab Versus Usual Care in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Mixed Dyslipidemia at High Cardiovascular Risk With Non-HDL-C Not Adequately Controlled With Maximally Tolerated Statin Therapy
Open the trial in the graphWho cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical correlates of lipoprotein (a) and apolipoprotein B levels in patients with dyslipidemia and cardiovascular disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Treatment of Dyslipidemia in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Review of Current Evidence and Knowledge Gaps.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Apolipoprotein B in the Risk Assessment, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Cardiometabolic Diseases.Cardiology and cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Classical and Novel Lipid-Lowering Therapies for Diabetic Patients with Established Coronary Artery Disease or High Risk of Coronary Artery Disease-A Narrative Clinical Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Targeting NPC1 in Renal Cell Carcinoma.Cancers · 2024Article
- Morphologies and composition changes in nonculprit subclinical atherosclerosis in diabetic versus nondiabetic patients with acute coronary syndrome who underwent long-term statin therapy.Scientific reports · 2023Observational
- Feeding-induced hepatokines and crosstalk with multi-organ: A novel therapeutic target for Type 2 diabetes.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Review
- Advanced progress of the relationship between PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies and hyperglycemic adverse events.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Personalized management of dyslipidemias in patients with diabetes-it is time for a new approach (2022).Cardiovascular diabetology · 2022Review
- Impact of Alirocumab on Release Markers of Atherosclerotic Plaque Vulnerability in Patients with Mixed Hyperlipidemia and Vulnerable Atherosclerotic Plaque.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
- Apolipoprotein B and Cardiovascular Disease: Biomarker and Potential Therapeutic Target.Metabolites · 2021Review
- Potential biomarker in serum for predicting susceptibility to type 2 diabetes mellitus: Free fatty acid 22:6.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2021Article
- Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk: current status and treatments.Current opinion in endocrinology, diabetes, and obesity · 2021Review
- Association of circulating proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 levels and the risk of incident type 2 diabetes in subjects with prediabetes: a population-based cohort study.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2020 · on this mapObservational
- Cholesterol lowering therapies and achievement of targets for primary and secondary cardiovascular prevention in type 2 diabetes: unmet needs in a large population of outpatients at specialist clinics.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2020Article
- Long-term prognostic utility of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) triglyceride in real-world patients with coronary artery disease and diabetes or prediabetes.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2020Article
- Research progress on alternative non-classical mechanisms of PCSK9 in atherosclerosis in patients with and without diabetes.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 9 institutions in 7 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMixed dyslipidemia [elevated non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) and triglycerides (TGs), and decreased HDL-C] is common in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and is associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Non-HDL-C and apolipoprotein B (ApoB) are the preferred therapeutic targets for mixed dyslipidemia. Alirocumab is a monoclonal antibody to proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) that effectively reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), non-HDL-C, ApoB, and lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]), and is well-tolerated in individuals with T2DM.
methodsThe previously reported open-label ODYSSEY DM-DYSLIPIDEMIA trial data demonstrated the effects of alirocumab on individuals with non-HDL-C ≥ 100 mg/dL and TGs ≥ 150 and < 500 mg/dL receiving stable maximally tolerated statin (n = 413). This post hoc subgroup analysis of the primary trial investigated the effects of alirocumab [75 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) with possible increase to 150 mg Q2W at Week 12] versus usual care [ezetimibe, fenofibrate, or no additional lipid-lowering therapy (LLT)] on non-HDL-C and other lipids in individuals with T2DM and baseline TGs ≥ 200 mg/dL and HDL-C < 40 mg/dL (men) or < 50 mg/dL (women).
resultsAlirocumab significantly reduced non-HDL-C [LS mean difference (standard error (SE)), - 35.0% (3.9)], ApoB [LS mean difference (SE), - 34.7% (3.6)], LDL-C [LS mean difference (SE), - 47.3% (5.2)], LDL particle number [LS mean difference (SE), - 40.8% (4.1)], and Lp(a) [LS mean difference (SE), - 29.9% (5.4)] versus usual care from baseline to Week 24 (all P < 0.0001). Results were similar for alirocumab versus usual care. TG reductions were similar between alirocumab and usual care (no significant difference), but greater with fenofibrate versus alirocumab (P = 0.3371). Overall, alirocumab significantly increased HDL-C versus usual care [LS mean difference (SE), 7.9% (3.6); P < 0.05], although differences with alirocumab versus ezetimibe or fenofibrate were non-significant. Most individuals receiving alirocumab achieved ApoB < 80 mg/dL (67.9%) and non-HDL-C < 100 mg/dL (60.9%). Adverse event frequency was similar between alirocumab (67.2%) and usual care (70.7%). Additionally, no clinically relevant effect of alirocumab on change in glycemic parameters or use of antihyperglycemic agents was observed.
conclusionsAlirocumab is an effective therapeutic option for individuals with T2DM, TGs ≥ 200 mg/dL, and HDL-C < 40 mg/dL (men) or < 50 mg/dL (women). Atherogenic lipid (ApoB and non-HDL) reductions were greater with alirocumab than ezetimibe, fenofibrate, or no LLT. Consistent with previous studies, alirocumab was generally well tolerated. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02642159. Registered December 24, 2015, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02642159.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.