Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32035041›Full record

ArticleThe lancet. HIV2020

Updated assessment of risks and benefits of dolutegravir versus efavirenz in new antiretroviral treatment initiators in sub-Saharan Africa: modelling to inform treatment guidelines.

Andrew N Phillips, Loveleen Bansi-Matharu, Francois Venter, Diane Havlir, Anton Pozniak, Daniel R Kuritzkes, Annemarie Wensing, Jens D Lundgren, Deenan Pillay, John Mellors and 15 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The lancet. HIV, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Switch to fixed-dose ainuovirine, lamivudine, and tenofovir DFThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 20 institutions in 8 countries.

Andrew N PhillipsInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK. Electronic address: andrew.phillips@ucl.ac.uk.
Loveleen Bansi-MatharuInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Francois VenterEzintsha, Wits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Diane HavlirSchool of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Anton PozniakChelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK; London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Daniel R KuritzkesBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Annemarie WensingEzintsha, Wits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Jens D LundgrenRigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Deenan PillayAfrica Health Research Institute, Mtubatuba, South Africa.
John MellorsDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PN, USA.
Valentina CambianoInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Andreas JahnMinistry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Tsitsi ApolloMinistry of Health and Child Care, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Owen MugurungiMinistry of Health and Child Care, Harare, Zimbabwe.
David RipinClinton Health Access Initiative, New York, NY, USA.
Juliana Da SilvaCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Elliot RaizesCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Nathan FordCentre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Research, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
George K SiberryOffice of HIV/AIDS, Global Health Bureau, United States Agency for International Development, Arlington, VA, USA.
Ravindra K GuptaCambridge Institute of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Ruanne BarnabasDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Paul RevillCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK.
Jennifer CohnElizabeth Glaser Paediatric Health Foundation, Washington, DC, USA.
Alexandra CalmyHIV/AIDS Unit, Geneva University Hospital, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Silvia BertagnolioWHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
University College London · GBCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USMinistry of Health and Child Welfare · ZWAfrica Health Research Institute · ZABrigham and Women's Hospital · USChelsea and Westminster Hospital · GBClinton Health Access Initiative · USElizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation · USMinistry of Health · MWRigshospitalet · DKUnited States Agency for International Development · USUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Cape Town · ZAUniversity of Geneva · CHUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZAUniversity of Washington · USUniversity of York · GB

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe integrase inhibitor dolutegravir is being considered in several countries in sub-Saharan Africa instead of efavirenz for people initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART) because of superior tolerability and a lower risk of resistance emergence. WHO requested updated modelling results for its 2019 Antiretroviral Guidelines update, which was restricted to the choice of dolutegravir or efavirenz in new ART initiators. In response to this request, we modelled the risks and benefits of alternative policies for initial first-line ART regimens.

methodsWe updated an existing individual-based model of HIV transmission and progression in adults to consider information on the risk of neural tube defects in women taking dolutegravir at time of conception, as well as the effects of dolutegravir on weight gain. The model accounted for drug resistance in determining viral suppression, with consequences for clinical outcomes and mother-to-child transmission. We sampled distributions of parameters to create various epidemic setting scenarios, which reflected the diversity of epidemic and programmatic situations in sub-Saharan Africa. For each setting scenario, we considered the situation in 2018 and compared ART initiation policies of an efavirenz-based regimen in women intending pregnancy, and a dolutegravir-based regimen in others, and a dolutegravir-based regimen, including in women intending pregnancy. We considered predicted outcomes over a 20-year period from 2019 to 2039, used a 3% discount rate, and a cost-effectiveness threshold of US$500 per disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) averted.

findingsConsidering updated information on risks and benefits, a policy of ART initiation with a dolutegravir-based regimen rather than an efavirenz-based regimen, including in women intending pregnancy, is predicted to bring population health benefits (10 990 DALYs averted per year) and to be cost-saving (by $2·9 million per year), leading to a reduction in the overall population burden of disease of 16 735 net DALYs per year for a country with an adult population size of 10 million. The policy involving ART initiation with a dolutegravir-based regimen in women intending pregnancy was cost-effective in 87% of our setting scenarios and this finding was robust in various sensitivity analyses, including around the potential negative effects of weight gain.

interpretationIn the context of a range of modelled setting scenarios in sub-Saharan Africa, we found that a policy of ART initiation with a dolutegravir-based regimen, including in women intending pregnancy, was predicted to bring population health benefits and be cost-effective, supporting WHO's strong recommendation for dolutegravir as a preferred drug for ART initiators.

fundingBill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAfrica South of the SaharaAlkynesAnti-HIV AgentsBenzoxazinesCost-Benefit AnalysisCyclopropanesDolutegravirFemaleHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingHIV InfectionsHumansInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalMaleMiddle AgedAlkynesAnti-HIV AgentsBenzoxazinesCyclopropanesDolutegravirefavirenzHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingOxazinesPiperazinesPyridones

Identifiers

PMID32035041
PMCPMC7167509
OpenAlexW3004533834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.