ReviewThe British journal of dermatology2020
The 2020 International Alliance for the Control of Scabies Consensus Criteria for the Diagnosis of Scabies.
Review in The British journal of dermatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06396507 (Comparing Sulfur to Different Regimes of Permethrin for the Treatment of Scabies), which is not on this map. Cited by 142 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparing Sulfur to Different Regimes of Permethrin for the Treatment of Scabies
Who cites it
142 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of oral ivermectin versus benzyl benzoate for the treatment of scabies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Global prevalence and predictors of scabies among prisoners: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC public health · 2024Pooled it
- Risk factors for scabies in hospital: a systematic review.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Pooled it
- Mass Drug Administration for the Control of Scabies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022Pooled it
- Oral ivermectin versus 5% permethrin cream to treat children and adults with classic scabies: multicentre, assessor blinded, cluster randomised clinical trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2026Trial
- One versus two doses of ivermectin-based mass drug administration for the control of scabies: A cluster randomised non-inferiority trial.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2023Trial
- Comparison of topical benzyl benzoate vs. oral ivermectin in treating scabies: A randomized study.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2023Trial
- A randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of individual versus household treatment for Scabies in Lambaréné, Gabon.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2020Trial
- Temporal trends in scabies-related emergency department visits: a retrospective trend analysis of 10,994 visits.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Anatomical Distribution of Scabies Lesions and Factors Associated With Typical Anatomical-Site Involvement Among Patients Attending a Dermatology Center in Mogadishu, Somalia: A Facility-Based Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- The rising burden of scabies in Italy: insights from a nationwide survey of dermatologists.Tropical medicine and health · 2026Article
- Disulfiram's Anti-Inflammatory and Antibacterial Effects in Fixed-Dose Combination Therapy for Scabies.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Dermoscopy in Monitoring Treatment Response in Scabies: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- CHILD-IVITAB, a Novel Orodispersible Ivermectin Formulation-Pharmaceutical Evaluation and Clinical Acceptability in Children <15 kg.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- The Tunnel Window Sign Identifies Active Scabies Infestation: A Validation Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Scabies outbreak management in a vulnerable elderly population: Evidence from northeastern Iran.Parasite epidemiology and control · 2026Article
- Massive scabies outbreak in Rohingya refugee camps, Cox's Bazar: Epidemiology and impact of a mass drug administration (MDA) campaign - A retrospective study.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Observational
- Unusual Bullous Manifestation of Scabies in Childhood Diagnosed by Dermoscopy: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Clinical features of 170 Chinese scabies cases and the therapeutic efficacy of sulfur ointment.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- Time trends in the burden of scabies from 1990 to 2021, and projections to 2050: Insights based on the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
82 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
32 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundScabies is a common parasitic skin condition that causes considerable morbidity globally. Clinical and epidemiological research for scabies has been limited by a lack of standardization of diagnostic methods.
objectivesTo develop consensus criteria for the diagnosis of common scabies that could be implemented in a variety of settings.
methodsConsensus diagnostic criteria were developed through a Delphi study with international experts. Detailed recommendations were collected from the expert panel to define the criteria features and guide their implementation. These comments were then combined with a comprehensive review of the available literature and the opinion of an expanded group of international experts to develop detailed, evidence-based definitions and diagnostic methods.
resultsThe 2020 International Alliance for the Control of Scabies (IACS) Consensus Criteria for the Diagnosis of Scabies include three levels of diagnostic certainty and eight subcategories. Confirmed scabies (level A) requires direct visualization of the mite or its products. Clinical scabies (level B) and suspected scabies (level C) rely on clinical assessment of signs and symptoms. Evidence-based, consensus methods for microscopy, visualization and clinical symptoms and signs were developed, along with a media library.
conclusionsThe 2020 IACS Criteria represent a pragmatic yet robust set of diagnostic features and methods. The criteria may be implemented in a range of research, public health and clinical settings by selecting the appropriate diagnostic levels and subcategories. These criteria may provide greater consistency and standardization for scabies diagnosis. Validation studies, development of training materials and development of survey methods are now required. What is already known about this topic? The diagnosis of scabies is limited by the lack of accurate, objective tests. Microscopy of skin scrapings can confirm the diagnosis, but it is insensitive, invasive and often impractical. Diagnosis usually relies on clinical assessment, although visualization using dermoscopy is becoming increasingly common. These diagnostic methods have not been standardized, hampering the interpretation of findings from clinical research and epidemiological surveys, and the development of scabies control strategies. What does this study add? International consensus diagnostic criteria for common scabies were developed through a Delphi study with global experts. The 2020 International Alliance for the Control of Scabies (IACS) Criteria categorize diagnosis at three levels of diagnostic certainty (confirmed, clinical and suspected scabies) and eight subcategories, and can be adapted to a range of research and public health settings. Detailed definitions and figures are included to aid training and implementation. The 2020 IACS Criteria may facilitate the standardization of scabies diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.