Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32034928›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine2020

Plasma disposition of gabapentin after the intragastric administration of escalating doses to adult horses.

Jenifer R Gold, Tamara L Grubb, Stephen Green, Sherry Cox, Nicolas F Villarino

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Gabapentin: Clinical Use and Pharmacokinetics in Dogs, Cats, and Horses.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A pilot study of transdermal gabapentin in cats.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jenifer R GoldDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1116-2032
Tamara L GrubbDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington.
Stephen GreenDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington.
Sherry CoxDepartment of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee.
Nicolas F VillarinoDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington.
Washington State University · USKnoxville College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn humans, gabapentin an analgesic, undergoes non-proportional pharmacokinetics which can alter efficacy. No information exists on the pharmacokinetics of dosages >20 mg/kg, escalating dosages or dose proportionality of gabapentin in horses. HYPOTHESIS AND

objectivesGabapentin exposure in plasma would not increase proportionally relative to the dose in horses receiving dosages ≥20 mg/kg. To assess the plasma pharmacokinetics of gabapentin after nasogastric administration of gabapentin at dosages of 10 to 160 mg/kg in adult horses. ANIMALS: Nine clinically healthy adult Arabian and Quarter Horses.

methodsIn a randomized blinded trial, gabapentin was administered by nasogastric intubation to horses at 10, 20 mg/kg (n = 3) and 60, 80, 120, 160 mg/kg (n = 6). Plasma was collected before and at regular times over 64 hours after administration of gabapentin. Gabapentin was quantified using a validated chromatographic method. Dose proportionality was estimated using a power model. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis.

resultsPlasma pharmacokinetics parameters of gabapentin were estimated after nasogastric administration at dosages of 10 to 160 mg/kg. Gabapentin plasma concentration increased with dose increments. However, the area under the concentration curve from zero to infinity and maximal plasma concentration did not increase proportionally relative to the dose in horses. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Gabapentin exposure in plasma is not proportional relative to the dose in horses receiving nasogastric dosages of 10 to 160 mg/kg.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAnalgesicsAnimalsArea Under CurveDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleGabapentinHorsesMaleAnalgesicsGabapentinanalgesiaequinelaminitisneuropathic painpharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID32034928
PMCPMC7096665
OpenAlexW3004761577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.