Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32034923›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2020

How the EMERGE guideline on medication adherence can improve the quality of clinical trials.

Lina Eliasson, Sarah Clifford, Amy Mulick, Christina Jackson, Bernard Vrijens

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Effect ofNutrients · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Risk of bias tools for medication adherence research: RoBIAS and RoBOAS.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Medication adherence reporting in pivotal clinical trials: overview of oral oncological drugs.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lina EliassonSprout Behaviour Change Ltd, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2982-9683
Sarah CliffordSprout Behaviour Change Ltd, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6811-4691
Amy MulickLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4009-2080
Christina JacksonSprout Behaviour Change Ltd, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3831-2387
Bernard VrijensAARDEX Group, Seraing, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9090-1253

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medication adherence in drug trials is suboptimal, affecting the quality of these studies and adding significant costs. Nonadherence in this setting can lead to null findings, unduly large sample sizes and the need for dose modification after a drug has been approved. Despite these drawbacks, adherence behaviours are not consistently measured, analysed or reported appropriately in trial settings. The ESPACOMP Medication Adherence Reporting Guideline (EMERGE) offers a solution by facilitating a sound protocol design that takes this crucial factor into account. This article summarises key evidence on traditional and newer measurements of adherence, discusses implementation in clinical trial settings and makes recommendations about the analysis and interpretation of adherence data. Given the potential benefits of this approach, the authors call on regulators and the pharmaceutical industry to endorse the EMERGE guideline.

Indexed as

Guideline AdherenceMedication AdherenceDrug IndustryHumansadherenceclinical trialspharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic

Identifiers

PMID32034923
PMCPMC7098872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.