Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32034908›Full record

Trial reportNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2020

Looming Vulnerability and Smoking Cessation Attempts.

David A F Haaga, Amanda Kaufmann, Elizabeth J Malloy

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. If at First You Don't Try ….Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David A F HaagaDepartment of Psychology, American University, Washington, DC.
Amanda KaufmannDepartment of Psychology, American University, Washington, DC.
Elizabeth J MalloyDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, American University, Washington, DC.
American University · US

Funding

Supplement to Promote Diversity: Looming Vulnerability and Smoking Cessation AttemptsR15CA198838 · NCI · AMERICAN UNIVERSITY · PI HAAGA, DAVID A. · 2015 to 2016
$353k
NCI NIH HHS R15 CA198838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe looming vulnerability model holds that people become anxious when they perceive threats as growing larger and accelerating toward them in space and time. Preliminary research suggested that a guided imagery induction designed to activate a sense that health consequences of smoking are a looming threat led more smokers to attempt to quit. This study tested the effect on quit attempts in a larger sample and examined age, sex, and sensation seeking as moderators. AIMS AND

methodsAdult smokers (≥10 cigarettes/day) screened for risk of anxiety or mood disorders (N = 278, 52% male; 77% African American) were randomly assigned to receive (1) looming vulnerability or (2) neutral guided imagery exercises. At a 4-week follow-up, they reported quit attempts, smoking rate, self-efficacy, outcome expectancies, and contemplation status.

resultsThose in the looming condition (17%) were no more likely than those in the control condition (20%) to make a quit attempt. There were no significant group differences in expectancies, contemplation, or follow-up smoking rate, and no significant moderators.

conclusionsThe looming induction was the same one used in earlier work in which it had stronger effects. Those who respond to it with increased urgency about quitting smoking might be offset by others who are more reactant and deny the message. Inconsistencies across studies may reflect differences in inclusion criteria, such that the present sample was on average heavier smokers with longer smoking history and more severe nicotine dependence, yet higher self-efficacy. IMPLICATIONS: An induction designed to activate a sense that the health consequences of smoking constitute a looming vulnerability failed to increase quit attempts or reduce smoking rate among adult daily smokers. Inconsistencies across studies might reflect varying sample characteristics resulting from changes in screening criteria.

Indexed as

District of ColumbiaEthnicityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSelf EfficacySmokersTobacco Use CessationTobacco Use Cessation DevicesTobacco Use DisorderVulnerable Populations

Identifiers

PMID32034908
PMCPMC7443586
OpenAlexW3005140080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.