Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32034726›Full record

ArticleClinical pharmacokinetics2020

Inability of Current Dosing to Achieve Carboplatin Therapeutic Targets in People with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Impact of Systemic Inflammation on Carboplatin Exposure and Clinical Outcomes.

Benjamin D W Harris, Viet Phan, Vidya Perera, Anneliese Szyc, Peter Galettis, Jennifer H Martin, Euan Walpole, Andrew J McLachlan, Stephen J Clarke, Stephanie E Reuter and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin D W HarrisDiscipline of Pharmacology and Bosch Institute, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Viet PhanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, NSW, 2139, Australia.
Vidya PereraDiscipline of Pharmacology and Bosch Institute, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Anneliese SzycSydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Peter GalettisDiscipline of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, 2305, Australia.
Jennifer H MartinDiscipline of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle and Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW, 2305, Australia.
Euan WalpoleMedical Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia.
Andrew J McLachlanSydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Stephen J ClarkeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, 2065, Australia.
Stephanie E ReuterSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
Kellie A CharlesDiscipline of Pharmacology and Bosch Institute, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. kellie.charles@sydney.edu.au.
The University of Sydney · AUConcord Repatriation General Hospital · AUHunter Medical Research Institute · AUNorthern Sydney Local Health District · AUThe University of Queensland · AUUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AUUniversity of South Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe presence of elevated systemic inflammation in people with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is associated with significantly shorter survival following carboplatin-based chemotherapy.

objectiveThis study investigated whether novel factors, such as systemic inflammation [platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)], impact carboplatin pharmacokinetics and drug utilisation. The study also examined the ability of current and alternate dosing regimens to meet therapeutic targets.

methodsSeventy-two people with advanced NSCLC treated with carboplatin-based (460-1050 mg) doublet chemotherapy were recruited and pharmacokinetic data (n = 61) were analysed using non-linear mixed modelling. Covariate analysis was performed to investigate the impact of standard and novel patient characteristics of carboplatin pharmacokinetics. A Monte Carlo simulation of 100,000 representative NSCLC patients evaluated the ability of the Calvert formula and novel dosing strategies to achieve the targeted therapeutic range. The associations between systemic inflammation and chemotherapy drug utilisation (cycles received, relative dose intensity (RDI) and second-line uptake) and clinical endpoints were also investigated in the pharmacokinetic cohort, and two independent cohorts of people with advanced NSCLC from the Chemotherapy Dosing in Cancer-Related Inflammation (CDCRI) database that were administered carboplatin-paclitaxel (n = 37) or carboplatin-gemcitabine (n = 358).

resultsIn all cohorts, 25-53% of people had elevated systemic inflammation (NLR > 5 or PLR > 300). In the pharmacokinetic cohort, no patients achieved the desired therapeutic target of carboplatin. Carboplatin exposure was related to renal function, as estimated using the Cockcroft-Gault formula, albumin and inflammation (NLR). In the pharmacokinetic cohort, increasing carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) correlated with greater reductions in red blood cells and haemoglobin. In this cohort, the average measured AUC of partial responders was 2.4 mg·min/mL. Also in the pharmacokinetic cohort, only 12% of people with an NLR > 5 received four or more cycles of chemotherapy, compared with 62% of patients with an NLR ≤ 5 (p < 0.001). For people in the CDCRI cohort receiving carboplatin-gemcitabine, those with an NLR > 5 also received less cycles (four or more cycles, 41% vs. 60%; p < 0.01) as well as less second-line chemotherapy (46% vs. 60%; p = 0.02) compared with patients without inflammation. People in the pharmacokinetic cohort with an NLR > 5 had 12 months less median survival compared with people with an NLR ≤ 5 (6.5 vs. 18 months; p = 0.08). Similarly, overall survival was significantly shortened in people in the CDCRI cohort receiving carboplatin-gemcitabine with an NLR > 5 compared with those with an NLR ≤ 5 (7 vs. 12 months; p < 0.001), and Cox regression analysis showed a 1.5-fold (1.3-2.1; p < 0.001) increased hazard of death associated with the increased systemic inflammation. Simulations of the newly developed model-based and Calvert dosing assessed the ability to reach this study's proposed actual target AUC of 2.2-2.6 mg·min/mL. These showed current Calvert dosing was predicted to result in substantial overexposure in patients with high systemic inflammation. The newly developed model showed equivalent levels of carboplatin therapeutic target achievement across the spectrum of inflammation observed in the lung cancer population.

conclusionAn alternate model-based dosing strategy for carboplatin was developed and is predicted to result in consistent drug exposure across the population and improve attainment of therapeutic targets. Further studies of this new model are warranted in people with advanced NSCLC.

Indexed as

CarboplatinCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsHumansInflammationPaclitaxelCarboplatinPaclitaxel

Identifiers

PMID32034726
OpenAlexW3004738993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.