Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32034584›Full record

ReviewClinical and translational medicine2020

The clinical potential of gene editing as a tool to engineer cell-based therapeutics.

Candice Ashmore-Harris, Gilbert O Fruhwirth

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and translational medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Gene editing enables non-invasiveMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Discovery in clinical and translational medicine.Clinical and translational medicine · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Candice Ashmore-HarrisImaging Therapy and Cancer Group, Dept of Imaging Chemistry & Biology, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, St Thomas' Hospital, King's College London (KCL), London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Gilbert O FruhwirthImaging Therapy and Cancer Group, Dept of Imaging Chemistry & Biology, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, St Thomas' Hospital, King's College London (KCL), London, SE1 7EH, UK. gilbert.fruhwirth@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1438-2674
Guy's Hospital · GBSt Thomas' Hospital · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 21153Wellcome Trust 203148/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust WT 203148/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical application of ex vivo gene edited cell therapies first began a decade ago with zinc finger nuclease editing of autologous CD4

Indexed as

Cell therapyClinical trialCRISPR–Cas9HIVOncologyTALENZinc finger nuclease

Identifiers

PMID32034584
PMCPMC7007464
OpenAlexW3012381500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.