Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32034539›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2020

Guppies show sex and individual differences in the ability to inhibit behaviour.

Tyrone Lucon-Xiccato, Angelo Bisazza, Cristiano Bertolucci

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Inhibitory control tests in non-human animals: validity, reliability, and perspectives.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tyrone Lucon-XiccatoDepartment of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, University of Ferrara, Via Borsari 46, 44121, Ferrara, Italy. tyrone.luconxiccato@unife.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1017-9230
Angelo BisazzaDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Cristiano BertolucciDepartment of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, University of Ferrara, Via Borsari 46, 44121, Ferrara, Italy.
University of Ferrara · ITUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

ANDROGEN REGULATION OF HUMAN SEBACEOUS GLANDSK08AR002018 · NIAMS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI THIBOUTOT, DIANE M. · 1997 to 2001
$225k
Università degli Studi di Ferrara FAR 2018Università degli Studi di Ferrara FIR 2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In humans, individual and sex differences have been long reported for several cognitive tasks and are at least in part due to variability in the function that inhibits behaviour (i.e. inhibitory control). Similar evidence of individual and sex differences in inhibitory abilities is also present in other vertebrates, but is scarce outside primates. Experiments on reversal learning, which requires inhibiting behaviours, suggest that this variability may exist in a teleost fish, the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. We tested this hypothesis by observing guppies in an inhibitory task. Guppies were exposed to unreachable prey inside a transparent tube for six trials. Guppies showed a marked reduction in the number of attempts to catch the prey within the first trial and also over repeated trials. We found a striking sex difference in the capacity to inhibit foraging behaviour. Males attempted to attack the prey twice as often as females and showed negligible improvement over trials. Irrespective of sex, individuals remarkably differed in their performance, with some guppies being systematically more skilled than others across the repeated trials. These results confirm that individual and sex differences in the ability to inhibit behaviour are not restricted to humans and other primates, suggesting that they might be widespread among vertebrates. Variability in inhibitory ability provides an explanation for emerging records of variability in other cognitive tasks in fish.

Indexed as

PoeciliaAnimalsFemaleHumansIndividualityMaleReversal LearningSex CharacteristicsFish cognitionIndividual differencesInhibitory controlSex differences

Identifiers

PMID32034539
OpenAlexW3005470587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.