Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32034524›Full record

ReviewCurrent infectious disease reports2020

Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales: Considerations for Treatment in the Era of New Antimicrobials and Evolving Enzymology.

Maxwell J Lasko, David P Nicolau

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current infectious disease reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Molecular epidemiology and mechanisms ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Challenges of Carbapenem-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Diverse Role ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The Clash of the Titans: COVID-19, Carbapenem-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maxwell J LaskoCenter for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, 80 Seymour Street, Hartford, CT, 06102, USA.
David P NicolauCenter for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, 80 Seymour Street, Hartford, CT, 06102, USA. david.nicolau@hhchealth.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewGram-negative resistance is a growing concern globally. Enterobacterales, formerly Enterobacteriaceae, have developed resistance mechanisms to carbapenems that leave very few antimicrobial options in the clinician's armamentarium. RECENT

findingsNew antimicrobials like ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-relebactam, cefiderocol, and plazomicin have the potential to overcome resistance mechanisms in Enterobacterales including different classes of carbapenemases. Novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors, plazomicin, and cefiderocol give the clinician options that were once not available. Utilizing these options is of the utmost importance when treating carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales.

Indexed as

CarbapenemaseEnterobacteralesEnterobacteriaceaeResistance

Identifiers

PMID32034524
PMCPMC7223591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.