Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32034421›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2020

Measuring significant changes in chromatin conformation with ACCOST.

Kate B Cook, Borislav H Hristov, Karine G Le Roch, Jean Philippe Vert, William Stafford Noble

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kate B CookDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-5065, USA.
Borislav H HristovDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-5065, USA.
Karine G Le RochDepartment of Cell Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.
Jean Philippe VertGoogle Brain, Paris, 75009, France.
William Stafford NobleDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-5065, USA.
University of Washington · USParisTech · FRUniversity of California, Riverside · US

Funding

Chromatin structure and control of gene expression in the human malaria parasiteR01AI136511 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE · PI LE ROCH, KARINE GAELLE · 2018 to 2022
$3.4M
The spatial organization of the Plasmodium genome throughout its infectious cycleR01AI106775 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LE ROCH, KARINE GAELLE, NOBLE, WILLIAM STAFFORD · 2013 to 2016
$1.8M
Evolution of the 3D chromatin structure in apicomplexan parasitesR21AI142506 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE · PI LE ROCH, KARINE GAELLE · 2019 to 2020
$479k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI106775NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI136511NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI142506
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromatin conformation assays such as Hi-C cannot directly measure differences in 3D architecture between cell types or cell states. For this purpose, two or more Hi-C experiments must be carried out, but direct comparison of the resulting Hi-C matrices is confounded by several features of Hi-C data. Most notably, the genomic distance effect, whereby contacts between pairs of genomic loci that are proximal along the chromosome exhibit many more Hi-C contacts that distal pairs of loci, dominates every Hi-C matrix. Furthermore, the form that this distance effect takes often varies between different Hi-C experiments, even between replicate experiments. Thus, a statistical confidence measure designed to identify differential Hi-C contacts must accurately account for the genomic distance effect or risk being misled by large-scale but artifactual differences. ACCOST (Altered Chromatin COnformation STatistics) accomplishes this goal by extending the statistical model employed by DEseq, re-purposing the 'size factors,' which were originally developed to account for differences in read depth between samples, to instead model the genomic distance effect. We show via analysis of simulated and real data that ACCOST provides unbiased statistical confidence estimates that compare favorably with competing methods such as diffHiC, FIND and HiCcompare. ACCOST is freely available with an Apache license at https://bitbucket.org/noblelab/accost.

Indexed as

Genetic LociGenomeSoftwareAnimalsCell LineChromatinDNAEpistasis, GeneticEpithelial CellsHumansLymphocytesMiceMolecular ConformationPlasmodium falciparumSporozoitesTrophozoitesChromatinDNA

Identifiers

PMID32034421
PMCPMC7049724
OpenAlexW3005484567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.