Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32034205›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Kinome Analysis of Honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) Dark-Eyed Pupae Identifies Biomarkers and Mechanisms of Tolerance to Varroa Mite Infestation.

Albert J Robertson, Erin Scruten, Mohammad Mostajeran, Tom Robertson, Connor Denomy, Daniel Hogan, Anna Roesler, Colton Rutherford, Anthony Kusalik, Philip Griebel and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Albert J RobertsonMeadow Ridge Enterprises Ltd., Saskatoon, SK, Canada. a.j.robertson@saskatraz.com.
Erin ScrutenVaccine and Infectious Disease Organization, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Mohammad MostajeranMeadow Ridge Enterprises Ltd., Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Tom RobertsonMeadow Ridge Enterprises Ltd., Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Connor DenomyVaccine and Infectious Disease Organization, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Daniel HoganDepartment of Computer Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Anna RoeslerVaccine and Infectious Disease Organization, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Colton RutherfordMeadow Ridge Enterprises Ltd., Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Anthony KusalikDepartment of Computer Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Philip GriebelVaccine and Infectious Disease Organization, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Scott NapperVaccine and Infectious Disease Organization, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada. scott.napper@usask.ca.
University of Saskatchewan · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mite Varroa destructor is a serious threat to honeybee populations. Selective breeding for Varroa mite tolerance could be accelerated by biomarkers within individual bees that could be applied to evaluate a colony phenotype. Previously, we demonstrated differences in kinase-mediated signaling between bees from colonies of extreme phenotypes of mite susceptibility. We expand these findings by defining a panel of 19 phosphorylation events that differ significantly between individual pupae from multiple colonies with distinct Varroa mite tolerant phenotypes. The predictive capacity of these biomarkers was evaluated by analyzing uninfested pupae from eight colonies representing a spectrum of mite tolerance. The pool of biomarkers effectively discriminated individual pupae on the basis of colony susceptibility to mite infestation. Kinome analysis of uninfested pupae from mite tolerant colonies highlighted an increased innate immune response capacity. The implication that differences in innate immunity contribute to mite susceptibility is supported by the observation that induction of innate immune signaling responses to infestation is compromised in pupae of the susceptible colonies. Collectively, biomarkers within individual pupae that are predictive of the susceptibility of colonies to mite infestation could provide a molecular tool for selective breeding of tolerant colonies.

Indexed as

AnimalsBeesBiomarkersEyeHost-Parasite InteractionsImmune ToleranceMite InfestationsPupaVarroidaeBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID32034205
PMCPMC7005721
OpenAlexW3005099269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.