Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32034195›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Large-for-gestational-age phenotypes and obesity risk in adulthood: a study of 195,936 women.

José G B Derraik, Sarah E Maessen, John D Gibbins, Wayne S Cutfield, Maria Lundgren, Fredrik Ahlsson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
20.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 127 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Feeding the hospitalized large-for-gestational-age infant: Clinical dilemmas and the need for growth standards.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

José G B DerraikLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. jderraik@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1226-1956
Sarah E MaessenLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9234-4887
John D GibbinsLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1523-8367
Wayne S CutfieldLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6107-3682
Maria LundgrenDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6318-3364
Fredrik AhlssonDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. fredrik.ahlsson@kbh.uu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8413-9274
University of Auckland · NZUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While there is evidence that being born large-for-gestational-age (LGA) is associated with an increased risk of obesity later in life, the data are conflicting. Thus, we aimed to examine the associations between proportionality at birth and later obesity risk in adulthood. This was a retrospective study using data recorded in the Swedish Birth Register. Anthropometry in adulthood was assessed in 195,936 pregnant women at 10-12 weeks of gestation. All women were born at term (37-41 weeks of gestation). LGA was defined as birth weight and/or length ≥2.0 SDS. Women were separated into four groups: appropriate-for-gestational-age according to both weight and length (AGA - reference group; n = 183,662), LGA by weight only (n = 4,026), LGA by length only (n = 5,465), and LGA by both weight and length (n = 2,783). Women born LGA based on length, weight, or both had BMI 0.12, 1.16, and 1.08 kg/m

Indexed as

Birth WeightAdultFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornObesityPhenotypeSweden

Identifiers

PMID32034195
PMCPMC7005699
OpenAlexW3004947630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.