Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32034171›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Ant workers produce males in queenless parts of multi-nest colonies.

Julia Giehr, Lisa Senninger, Katja Ruhland, Jürgen Heinze

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Phenomenon of reproductive plasticity in ants.Current opinion in insect science · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Queen loss increases worker survival in leaf-cutting ants under paraquat-induced oxidative stress.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  5. Queen execution in a monogynous ant.Ecology and evolution · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julia GiehrUniversity of Regensburg, Zoology/Evolutionary Biology, Universitätsstr. 31, D-93053, Regensburg, Germany. julia.Giehr@ur.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8712-3510
Lisa SenningerUniversity of Regensburg, Zoology/Evolutionary Biology, Universitätsstr. 31, D-93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Katja RuhlandUniversity of Regensburg, Zoology/Evolutionary Biology, Universitätsstr. 31, D-93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Jürgen HeinzeUniversity of Regensburg, Zoology/Evolutionary Biology, Universitätsstr. 31, D-93053, Regensburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Workers of several social insects are capable of gaining direct fitness by laying unfertilized eggs, which then develop into males. However, under queenright conditions, direct reproduction of workers is usually prevented by queen-induced regulatory mechanisms. In nature, some ant colonies inhabit multiple nests sites (polydomy). This might allow workers to escape queen control and to reproduce. However, whether worker-produced brood survives after colony reunion in seasonally polydomous species remains unclear. In several species, worker-produced eggs and male-destined larvae are selectively destroyed in queenright colonies. Here, we test whether workers discriminate between queen- and worker-produced larvae during colony reunion. We examined the reproductive success of workers in queenless subcolonies of our study species Temnothorax crassispinus. Our results show that present brood did not inhibit worker reproduction but had a positive effect on worker lifespan. Larvae produced by workers were readily integrated into queenright subcolonies during colony reunion and these larvae successfully developed into adult males.

Indexed as

ReproductionSocial BehaviorAnimalsAntsBiological EvolutionFemaleMale

Identifiers

PMID32034171
PMCPMC7005753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.