Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32034151›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Single cell analyses reveal contrasting life strategies of the two main nitrifiers in the ocean.

Katharina Kitzinger, Hannah K Marchant, Laura A Bristow, Craig W Herbold, Cory C Padilla, Abiel T Kidane, Sten Littmann, Holger Daims, Petra Pjevac, Frank J Stewart and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Katharina KitzingerMax Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, 28359, Bremen, Germany. kkitzing@mpi-bremen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7382-7103
Hannah K MarchantMax Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, 28359, Bremen, Germany. hmarchan@mpi-bremen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1482-9165
Laura A BristowMax Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, 28359, Bremen, Germany.
Craig W HerboldCentre for Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science, Division of Microbial Ecology, University of Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3479-0197
Cory C PadillaSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332-0230, USA.
Abiel T KidaneMax Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, 28359, Bremen, Germany.
Sten LittmannMax Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, 28359, Bremen, Germany.
Holger DaimsCentre for Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science, Division of Microbial Ecology, University of Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Petra PjevacCentre for Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science, Division of Microbial Ecology, University of Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7344-302X
Frank J StewartSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332-0230, USA.
Michael WagnerCentre for Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science, Division of Microbial Ecology, University of Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9778-7684
Marcel M M KuypersMax Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, 28359, Bremen, Germany.
University of Vienna · ATMax Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology · DEGeorgia Institute of Technology · USUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nitrification, the oxidation of ammonia via nitrite to nitrate, is a key process in marine nitrogen (N) cycling. Although oceanic ammonia and nitrite oxidation are balanced, ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA) vastly outnumber the main nitrite oxidizers, the bacterial Nitrospinae. The ecophysiological reasons for this discrepancy in abundance are unclear. Here, we compare substrate utilization and growth of Nitrospinae to AOA in the Gulf of Mexico. Based on our results, more than half of the Nitrospinae cellular N-demand is met by the organic-N compounds urea and cyanate, while AOA mainly assimilate ammonium. Nitrospinae have, under in situ conditions, around four-times higher biomass yield and five-times higher growth rates than AOA, despite their ten-fold lower abundance. Our combined results indicate that differences in mortality between Nitrospinae and AOA, rather than thermodynamics, biomass yield and cell size, determine the abundances of these main marine nitrifiers. Furthermore, there is no need to invoke yet undiscovered, abundant nitrite oxidizers to explain nitrification rates in the ocean.

Identifiers

PMID32034151
PMCPMC7005884
OpenAlexW3005025658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.