Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32034081›Full record

ArticlePediatrics2020

Factors Associated With Choice of Infant Sleep Location.

Ann Kellams, Fern R Hauck, Rachel Y Moon, Stephen M Kerr, Timothy Heeren, Michael J Corwin, Eve Colson

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ann KellamsDepartments of Pediatrics and alk9c@virginia.edu.
Fern R HauckFamily Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Rachel Y MoonDepartments of Pediatrics and.
Stephen M KerrSlone Epidemiology Center, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts; and.
Timothy HeerenDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health and.
Michael J CorwinSlone Epidemiology Center, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts; and.
Eve ColsonDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Boston University · USUniversity of Virginia · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Study of Attitudes and Factors Affecting Infant CareU10HD059207 · NICHD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI CORWIN, MICHAEL J · 2009 to 2013
$3.4M
NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD059207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the prevalence of and factors associated with actual recent practice and near-future intention for infant sleep location in a national sample.

methodsThere were 3260 mothers from 32 US hospitals who responded to a survey at infant age 2 to 6 months regarding care practices, including usual and all infant sleep locations in the previous 2 weeks and intended location for the next 2 weeks. Mothers were categorized as (1) having practiced and/or intending to practice exclusive room-sharing without bed-sharing, (2) having practiced anything other than exclusive room-sharing but intending to practice exclusive room-sharing, (3) intending to have the infant sleep in another room; and (4) intending to practice bed-sharing all night or part of the night. Multivariable multinomial logistic regression examined associations between sleep-location category, demographics, feeding method, doctor advice, and theory of planned behavior domains (attitudes, social norms, and perceived control).

resultsFewer than half (45.4%) of the mothers practiced and also intended to practice room-sharing without bed-sharing, and 24.2% intended to practice some bed-sharing. Factors associated with intended bed-sharing included African American race and exclusive breastfeeding; however, the highest likelihood of bed-sharing intent was associated with perceived social norms favoring bed-sharing (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 5.84; 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.14-8.22) and positive attitudes toward bed-sharing (aOR 190.1; 95% CI 62.4-579.0). Women with a doctor's advice to room-share without bed-sharing intended to practice bed-sharing less (aOR 0.56; 95% CI 0.36-0.85).

conclusionsSleep-location practices do not always align with the recommendation to room-share without bed-sharing, and intention does not always correspond with previous practice. Attitudes, perceived social norms, and doctor advice are factors that are amenable to change and should be considered in educational interventions.

Indexed as

Maternal BehaviorSleepAdultBedsFemaleHumansInfantInfant CareMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32034081
PMCPMC7049941
OpenAlexW2747015799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.