Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32034026›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Hyperosmolar therapy for acute brain injury: study protocol for an umbrella review of meta-analyses and an evidence mapping.

Rafael Badenes, Brian Hutton, Giuseppe Citerio, Chiara Robba, Gerardo Aguilar, Adolfo Alonso-Arroyo, Fabio Silvio Taccone, Carlos Tornero, Ferrán Catalá-López

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Rafael BadenesDepartment of Anesthesiology and Surgical-Trauma Intensive Care, Hospital Clinic Universitari de València, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Brian HuttonSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5662-8647
Giuseppe CiterioNeurointensive Care, San Gerardo Hospital, ASST-Monza, Monza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5374-3161
Chiara RobbaDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Gerardo AguilarDepartment of Anesthesiology and Surgical-Trauma Intensive Care, Hospital Clinic Universitari de València, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Adolfo Alonso-ArroyoDepartment of History of Science and Documentation, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Fabio Silvio TacconeDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Carlos TorneroDepartment of Anesthesiology and Surgical-Trauma Intensive Care, Hospital Clinic Universitari de València, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Ferrán Catalá-LópezINCLIVA Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain ferran_catala@outlook.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3833-9312
Universitat de València · ESAzienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo · ITConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BEUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAcute brain injury is a challenging public health problem worldwide. Elevated intracranial pressure is a common complication after acute brain injury. Hyperosmolar therapy is one of the main therapeutic strategies for the management of intracranial hypertension. This study protocol outlines an umbrella review of meta-analyses which will investigate the benefits and harms of hyperosmolar therapy routinely used for the management of acute brain injury in the intensive care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. We will include meta-analyses of primary research studies (eg, randomised controlled trials, observational studies or both) that evaluate one or more hyperosmolar solutions (including hypertonic saline and/or mannitol) for the treatment of adult patients with acute brain injury of any severity. Two researchers will independently screen all citations, full-text articles and abstract data. Potential conflicts will be resolved through discussion with a third researcher. Primary outcomes will be mortality and neurological outcomes at discharge. Secondary outcomes will include control of intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, length of stay (in hospital an intensive care unit) and any adverse event. Quality of the included meta-analyses will be assessed using the AMSTAR-2 tool. An overall summary of methods and results will be performed using tabular and graphical approaches and will be supplemented by narrative description. We will analyse whether published meta-analyses present an outline of available evidence (eg, cited, described and discussed any previous meta-analysis). Where objectives from two or more meta-analyses overlap, we will assess the causes of any noted discrepancies between meta-analyses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval will be required. Findings from this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. All data will be deposited in a cross-disciplinary public repository. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019148152.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticFluid TherapyIntracranial HypertensionSaline Solution, HypertonicCritical CareEvidence-Based MedicineHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as TopicTreatment OutcomeSaline Solution, Hypertonicbrain injuryhyperosmolar therapyhypertonic salinemannitolmeta-analysissystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32034026
PMCPMC7045244
OpenAlexW3005530379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.