Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32033905›Full record

ArticleJournal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association2020

Why Physicians Prescribe Prophylactic Seizure Medications after Intracerebral Hemorrhage: An Adaptive Conjoint Analysis.

Daniel Pinto, Shyam Prabhakaran, Elizabeth Tipton, Andrew M Naidech

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Long-term continuation of anti-seizure medications after acute stroke.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniel PintoMarquette University, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Shyam PrabhakaranUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Elizabeth TiptonNorthwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.
Andrew M NaidechNorthwestern University at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address: a-naidech@northwestern.edu.

Funding

Hemostasis, Hematoma Expansion, and Outcomes After Intracerebral HemorrhageR01NS110779 · NINDS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI NAIDECH, ANDREW M · 2019 to 2023
$3.3M
Health related quality of life and seizure medications after hemorrhagic strokeK18HS023437 · AHRQ · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI NAIDECH, ANDREW M · 2015 to 2016
$357k
AHRQ HHS K18 HS023437NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS110779
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeizures are a morbid complication of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and increase the risk for herniation, status epilepticus, and worse patient outcomes. Prophylactic levetiracetam is administered to approximately 40% of patients with ICH. It is unclear which patients are consciously selected for treatment by physicians. We sought to determine how patients are selected for treatment with prophylactic levetiracetam after ICH.

methodsWe administered an adaptive conjoint analysis using decision making software to an NIH Stroke Trials Network Working Group. The adaptive conjoint analysis determines the most influential attributes for making a decision in an iterative, algorithm-driven process. We asked respondents which would most influence a decision to administer prophylactic levetiracetam. The attributes and their levels were taken from published phenotypes associated with prophylactic seizure medications and the likelihood of seizures after ICH: hematoma location (lobar or basal ganglia), hematoma volume (<=10 mL or >10 mL), level of consciousness (Glasgow Coma Scale 5-12 or Glasgow Coma Scale 13-15), age (<65 or ≥65 years), and race (White or Caucasian or Black/African American). The algorithm terminated when the attributes were ranked from most to least influential.

resultsThe study sample included 27 respondents who completed the adaptive conjoint analysis out of 42 who responded to the survey with a mean age of 43.4 ± 9.4 years. The attribute with the greatest weight was hematoma location (30%), followed by reduced level of consciousness (24%), hematoma volume (19%), race (14%), and age (13%). Ranks of attributes were different (P < .001).

conclusionsThe decision to administer prophylactic levetiracetam to patients with ICH is driven by lobar hematoma location and depressed level of consciousness. Future research on prophylactic seizure medication could focus on patients most likely to receive it.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesPractice Patterns, Physicians'AdultAgedAnticonvulsantsAttitude of Health PersonnelCerebral HemorrhageClinical Decision-MakingDrug Administration ScheduleDrug UtilizationFemaleHealth Care SurveysHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansLevetiracetamMaleAnticonvulsantsLevetiracetamadaptive conjoint analysisdecision makingintracerebral hemorrhagelevetiracetamSeizure medications

Identifiers

PMID32033905
PMCPMC7099929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.