Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32033534›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2020

Are scurs in heterozygous polled (Pp) cattle a complex quantitative trait?

Lilian Johanna Gehrke, Aurélien Capitan, Carsten Scheper, Sven König, Maulik Upadhyay, Kristin Heidrich, Ingolf Russ, Doris Seichter, Jens Tetens, Ivica Medugorac and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Lilian Johanna GehrkeInstitute of Animal Breeding and Husbandry, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel, 24098, Kiel, Germany. lilian.gehrke@vit.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7842-6333
Aurélien CapitanUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Carsten ScheperInstitute of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Justus-Liebig-University of Gießen, 35390, Gießen, Germany.
Sven KönigInstitute of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Justus-Liebig-University of Gießen, 35390, Gießen, Germany.
Maulik UpadhyayPopulation Genomics Group, Department of Veterinary Sciences, Ludwig Maximillians University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Kristin HeidrichPopulation Genomics Group, Department of Veterinary Sciences, Ludwig Maximillians University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Ingolf RussTierzuchtforschung e.V. München, Grub, Germany.
Doris SeichterTierzuchtforschung e.V. München, Grub, Germany.
Jens TetensDepartment of Animal Sciences, Georg-August University, 37077, Göttingen, Germany.
Ivica MedugoracPopulation Genomics Group, Department of Veterinary Sciences, Ludwig Maximillians University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Georg ThallerInstitute of Animal Breeding and Husbandry, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel, 24098, Kiel, Germany.
Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel · DEJustus-Liebig-Universität Gießen · DEAgroParisTech · FRUniversity of Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreeding genetically hornless, i.e. polled, cattle provides an animal welfare-friendly and non-invasive alternative to the dehorning of calves. However, the molecular regulation of the development of horns in cattle is still poorly understood. Studying genetic characters such as polledness and scurs, can provide valuable insights into this process. Scurs are hornlike formations that occur occasionally in a wide variety of sizes and forms as an unexpected phenotype when breeding polled cattle.

methodsWe present a unique dataset of 885 Holstein-Friesian cattle with polled parentage. The horn phenotype was carefully examined, and the phenotypic heterogeneity of the trait is described. Using a direct gene test for polledness, the polled genotype of the animals was determined. Subsequently, the existence of a putative scurs locus was investigated using high-density genotype data of a selected subset of 232 animals and two mapping approaches: mixed linear model-based association analyses and combined linkage disequilibrium and linkage analysis.

resultsThe results of an exploratory data analysis indicated that the expression of scurs depends on age at phenotyping, sex and polled genotype. Scurs were more prevalent in males than in females. Moreover, homozygous polled animals did not express any pronounced scurs and we found that the Friesian polled allele suppresses the development of scurs more efficiently than the Celtic polled allele. Combined linkage and linkage disequilibrium mapping revealed four genome-wide significant loci that affect the development of scurs, one on BTA5 and three on BTA12. Moreover, suggestive associations were detected on BTA16, 18 and 23. The mixed linear model-based association analysis supports the results of the combined linkage and linkage disequilibrium analysis. None of the mapping approaches provided convincing evidence for a monogenic inheritance of scurs.

conclusionsOur results contradict the initial and still broadly accepted model for the inheritance of horns and scurs. We hypothesise an oligogenetic model to explain the development of scurs and polledness.

Indexed as

Quantitative Trait LociAllelesAnimalsBreedingCattleFemaleGenomeGenotypeHeterozygoteHornsLinkage DisequilibriumMaleMultifactorial InheritancePhenotype

Identifiers

PMID32033534
PMCPMC7006098
OpenAlexW3008235900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.