ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2020
pCADD: SNV prioritisation in Sus scrofa.
Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- A generic pipeline for CADD score generation: chickenCADD and turkeyCADD.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Predicting the functional impact of single nucleotide variants in Drosophila melanogaster with FlyCADD.Genetics · 2026Article
- A genome-wide association study reveals additive and recessive alleles affecting male fertility in pigs.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Whole genome sequences of 289 native cattle from Finland, the Netherlands, and Portugal.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Role of multi-omics in aquaculture genetics and breeding: current status and future perspective.Science China. Life sciences · 2025Review
- Multi-dimensional annotation of porcine variants using genomic and epigenomic features in pigs.BMC biology · 2025Article
- Estimating mutation rate and characterising single nucleotide de novo mutations in pigs.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2025Article
- Evaluating the Performance ofCombinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2025Article
- Whole-genome analysis reveals distinct adaptation signatures to diverse environments in Chinese domestic pigs.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2024Article
- A DIO2 missense mutation and its impact on fetal response to PRRSV infection.BMC veterinary research · 2024Article
- CADD v1.7: using protein language models, regulatory CNNs and other nucleotide-level scores to improve genome-wide variant predictions.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Large scale sequence-based screen for recessive variants allows for identification and monitoring of rare deleterious variants in pigs.PLoS genetics · 2024Article
- A genome-wide association study for loin depth and muscle pH in pigs from intensely selected purebred lines.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2023Article
- Identification of the genetic basis of sow pelvic organ prolapse.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- African Suid Genomes Provide Insights into the Local Adaptation to Diverse African Environments.Molecular biology and evolution · 2022Article
- Insights into the architecture of human-induced polygenic selection in Duroc pigs.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Genetic load: genomic estimates and applications in non-model animals.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2022Review
- Distinct traces of mixed ancestry in western commercial pig genomes following gene flow from Chinese indigenous breeds.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Evidence for and localization of proposed causative variants in cattle and pig genomes.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn animal breeding, identification of causative genetic variants is of major importance and high economical value. Usually, the number of candidate variants exceeds the number of variants that can be validated. One way of prioritizing probable candidates is by evaluating their potential to have a deleterious effect, e.g. by predicting their consequence. Due to experimental difficulties to evaluate variants that do not cause an amino-acid substitution, other prioritization methods are needed. For human genomes, the prediction of deleterious genomic variants has taken a step forward with the introduction of the combined annotation dependent depletion (CADD) method. In theory, this approach can be applied to any species. Here, we present pCADD (p for pig), a model to score single nucleotide variants (SNVs) in pig genomes.
resultsTo evaluate whether pCADD captures sites with biological meaning, we used transcripts from miRNAs and introns, sequences from genes that are specific for a particular tissue, and the different sites of codons, to test how well pCADD scores differentiate between functional and non-functional elements. Furthermore, we conducted an assessment of examples of non-coding and coding SNVs, which are causal for changes in phenotypes. Our results show that pCADD scores discriminate between functional and non-functional sequences and prioritize functional SNVs, and that pCADD is able to score the different positions in a codon relative to their redundancy. Taken together, these results indicate that based on pCADD scores, regions with biological relevance can be identified and distinguished according to their rate of adaptation.
conclusionsWe present the ability of pCADD to prioritize SNVs in the pig genome with respect to their putative deleteriousness, in accordance to the biological significance of the region in which they are located. We created scores for all possible SNVs, coding and non-coding, for all autosomes and the X chromosome of the pig reference sequence Sscrofa11.1, proposing a toolbox to prioritize variants and evaluate sequences to highlight new sites of interest to explain biological functions that are relevant to animal breeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.