ArticleGenes2020
A Fast and Scalable Workflow for SNPs Detection in Genome Sequences Using Hadoop Map-Reduce.
Article in Genes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Chamber-Based Digital PCR Based on a Microfluidic Chip for the Absolute Quantification and Analysis of KRAS Mutation.Biosensors · 2023Article
- Competitive SNP-LAMP probes for rapid and robust single-nucleotide polymorphism detection.Cell reports methods · 2022Article
- Genetic variations analysis for complex brain disease diagnosis using machine learning techniques: opportunities and hurdles.PeerJ. Computer science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies produce a huge amount of biological data, which poses various issues such as requirements of high processing time and large memory. This research focuses on the detection of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in genome sequences. Currently, SNPs detection algorithms face several issues, e.g., computational overhead cost, accuracy, and memory requirements. In this research, we propose a fast and scalable workflow that integrates Bowtie aligner with Hadoop based Heap SNP caller to improve the SNPs detection in genome sequences. The proposed workflow is validated through benchmark datasets obtained from publicly available web-portals, e.g., NCBI and DDBJ DRA. Extensive experiments have been performed and the results obtained are compared with Bowtie and BWA aligner in the alignment phase, while compared with GATK, FaSD, SparkGA, Halvade, and Heap in SNP calling phase. Experimental results analysis shows that the proposed workflow outperforms existing frameworks e.g., GATK, FaSD, Heap integrated with BWA and Bowtie aligners, SparkGA, and Halvade. The proposed framework achieved 22.46% more efficient F-score and 99.80% consistent accuracy on average. More, comparatively 0.21% mean higher accuracy is achieved. Moreover, SNP mining has also been performed to identify specific regions in genome sequences. All the frameworks are implemented with the default configuration of memory management. The observations show that all workflows have approximately same memory requirement. In the future, it is intended to graphically show the mined SNPs for user-friendly interaction, analyze and optimize the memory requirements as well.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.