Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32033304›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Technology-Based Substance Use Interventions: Opportunities for Gender-Transformative Health Promotion.

Julie Stinson, Lindsay Wolfson, Nancy Poole

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Assessing the feasibility, usability and acceptability of theDrug and alcohol dependence reports · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Missing in Action: Sex and Gender in Substance Use Research.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julie StinsonCentre of Excellence for Women's Health, D404-4500 Oak St, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6317-9464
Lindsay WolfsonCentre of Excellence for Women's Health, D404-4500 Oak St, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1, Canada.
Nancy PooleCentre of Excellence for Women's Health, D404-4500 Oak St, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1, Canada.

Funding

CIHR #384548
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drawing on data from a scoping review on sex, gender and substance use, this narrative review explores the use of gender-informed and technology-based approaches in substance use prevention and health promotion interventions. With an ever-changing landscape of new technological developments, an understanding of how technology-based interventions can address sex, gender, and intersecting equity considerations related to substance use is warranted. Current technology-based approaches to substance use prevention and health promotion are described and assessed for gender-specific and gender transformative outcomes, and limitations are discussed related to inclusivity, access, confidentiality, and a dearth of research on technological approaches that integrate gender-based analysis. A call for action designed to advance technology-based health promotion, prevention and brief interventions that address gender equity simultaneously with substance use is proposed.

Indexed as

TechnologyFemaleHealth PromotionHumansSex FactorsSexismSubstance-Related Disordersgendergender transformativehealth promotionSGBA+substance usesubstance use preventiontechnology

Identifiers

PMID32033304
PMCPMC7037203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.