SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020
Setting Priorities to Inform Assessment of Care Homes' Readiness to Participate in Healthcare Innovation: A Systematic Mapping Review and Consensus Process.
Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- A multidomain decision support tool to prevent falls in older people: the FinCH cluster RCT.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2022Trial
- Multifactorial falls prevention programme compared with usual care in UK care homes for older people: multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial with economic evaluation.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2021Trial
- Barriers and facilitators to implement innovations in Canadian long-term care facilities: a longitudinal study of organizational readiness for knowledge translation.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Article
- Piloting a minimum data set (MDS) in english care homes: a qualitative study of professional perspectives on implementation and data use.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Technology-enabled CONTACT tracing in care homes in the COVID-19 pandemic: the CONTACT non-randomised mixed-methods feasibility study.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2025Article
- Improving and supporting quality of care in Dutch nursing homes: a quantitative study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Audit and group feedback in nursing home physician groups: lessons learned from a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Piloting a minimum data set for older people living in care homes in England: a developmental study.Age and ageing · 2025Article
- CONTACT: a non-randomised feasibility study of bluetooth-enabled wearables for contact tracing in UK care homes during the COVID-19 pandemic.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2024Article
- "Crack on": a qualitative study of care home managers experiences and responses to system-led setbacks during the crisis of the COVID-19 Pandemic in England.European geriatric medicine · 2023Article
- Recognising and responding to acute deterioration in care home residents: a scoping review.BMC geriatrics · 2023Article
- Video Conferencing With Residents and Families for Care Planning During COVID-19: Experiences in Canadian Long-Term Care.The Gerontologist · 2023Article
- What is the level of information technology maturity in Ontario's long-term care homes? A cross-sectional survey study protocol.BMJ open · 2023Article
- General practitioners' role in improving health care in care homes: a realist review.Family practice · 2023Review
- Frailty nurse and GP-led models of care in care homes: the role of contextual factors impacting Enhanced health in care homes framework implementation.BMC geriatrics · 2023Article
- Using participatory research to co-produce an education and training e-resource to support care home staff to meet the sexuality, intimacy and relationship needs of care home residents with and without dementia.Frontiers in dementia · 2023Article
- Person-attuned musical interactions (PAMI) in dementia care. Complex intervention research for constructing a training manual.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- A realist evaluation of a multifactorial falls prevention programme in care homes.Age and ageing · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Organisational context is known to impact on the successful implementation of healthcare initiatives in care homes. We undertook a systematic mapping review to examine whether researchers have considered organisational context when planning, conducting, and reporting the implementation of healthcare innovations in care homes. Review data were mapped against the Alberta Context Tool, which was designed to assess organizational context in care homes. The review included 56 papers. No studies involved a systematic assessment of organisational context prior to implementation, but many provided post hoc explanations of how organisational context affected the success or otherwise of the innovation. Factors identified to explain a lack of success included poor senior staff engagement, non-alignment with care home culture, limited staff capacity to engage, and low levels of participation from health professionals such as general practitioners (GPs). Thirty-five stakeholders participated in workshops to discuss findings and develop questions for assessing care home readiness to participate in innovations. Ten questions were developed to initiate conversations between innovators and care home staff to support research and implementation. This framework can help researchers initiate discussions about health-related innovation. This will begin to address the gap between implementation theory and practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.