Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32033083›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Expanding the CRISPR Toolbox in

Florian Veillet, Laura Perrot, Anouchka Guyon-Debast, Marie-Paule Kermarrec, Laura Chauvin, Jean-Eric Chauvin, Jean-Luc Gallois, Marianne Mazier, Fabien Nogué

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Genome Editing Approaches in Flax (International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. From Lab to Field: CRISPRing Major CultivatedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  6. Molecular breeding of tomato: Advances and challenges.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Biotechnological Advances to Improve Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crops.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  11. Exploring C-to-G and A-to-Y Base Editing in Rice by Using New Vector Tools.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Base Editors for Citrus Gene Editing.Frontiers in genome editing · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. CRISPR-Cas9 Targeting of theFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Florian VeilletINRAE, Agrocampus Ouest, Université de Rennes, IGEPP, F-29260 Ploudaniel, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6892-6825
Laura PerrotINRAE, GAFL, F-84143 Montfavet, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1149-4504
Anouchka Guyon-DebastInstitut Jean-Pierre Bourgin, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, 78000 Versailles, France.
Marie-Paule KermarrecINRAE, Agrocampus Ouest, Université de Rennes, IGEPP, F-29260 Ploudaniel, France.
Laura ChauvinINRAE, Agrocampus Ouest, Université de Rennes, IGEPP, F-29260 Ploudaniel, France.
Jean-Eric ChauvinINRAE, Agrocampus Ouest, Université de Rennes, IGEPP, F-29260 Ploudaniel, France.
Jean-Luc GalloisINRAE, GAFL, F-84143 Montfavet, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0451-1740
Marianne MazierINRAE, GAFL, F-84143 Montfavet, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1441-6897
Fabien NoguéInstitut Jean-Pierre Bourgin, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, 78000 Versailles, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0619-4638
Institut Agro Rennes-Angers · FRInstitut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FRAgroParisTech · FR

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-10-LABX-0040-SPSAgence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-11-BTBR-0001_GENIUS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome editing has become a major tool for both functional studies and plant breeding in several species. Besides generating knockouts through the classical CRISPR-Cas9 system, recent development of CRISPR base editing holds great and exciting opportunities for the production of gain-of-function mutants. The PAM requirement is a strong limitation for CRISPR technologies such as base editing, because the base substitution mainly occurs in a small edition window. As precise single amino-acid substitution can be responsible for functions associated to some domains or agronomic traits, development of Cas9 variants with relaxed PAM recognition is of upmost importance for gene function analysis and plant breeding. Recently, the SpCas9-NG variant that recognizes the NGN PAM has been successfully tested in plants, mainly in monocotyledon species. In this work, we studied the efficiency of SpCas9-NG in the model moss

Indexed as

Amino Acid SubstitutionBryopsidaCRISPR-Associated Protein 9CRISPR-Cas SystemsCrops, AgriculturalGene EditingPlants, Genetically ModifiedSolanum lycopersicumSolanum tuberosumStreptococcus pyogenesCRISPR-Associated Protein 9alternative PAMbase editingCBECRISPR-Cas9Physcomitrella patenspotatoSpCas9-NGtomatoxCas9

Identifiers

PMID32033083
PMCPMC7036883
OpenAlexW3005407564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.