Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32033072›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Zero-Shot Human Activity Recognition Using Non-Visual Sensors.

Fadi Al Machot, Mohammed R Elkobaisi, Kyandoghere Kyamakya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fadi Al MachotResearch Center Borstel-Leibniz Lung Center, 23845 Borstel, Germany.
Mohammed R ElkobaisiInstitute for Applied Informatics, Application Engineering, Alpen-Adria University, 9020 Klagenfurt, Austria.
Kyandoghere KyamakyaInstitute for Smart Systems Technologies, Alpen-Adria University, 9020 Klagenfurt, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-0773-9476

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to significant advances in sensor technology, studies towards activity recognition have gained interest and maturity in the last few years. Existing machine learning algorithms have demonstrated promising results by classifying activities whose instances have been already seen during training. Activity recognition methods based on real-life settings should cover a growing number of activities in various domains, whereby a significant part of instances will not be present in the training data set. However, to cover all possible activities in advance is a complex and expensive task. Concretely, we need a method that can extend the learning model to detect unseen activities without prior knowledge regarding sensor readings about those previously unseen activities. In this paper, we introduce an approach to leverage sensor data in discovering new unseen activities which were not present in the training set. We show that sensor readings can lead to promising results for zero-shot learning, whereby the necessary knowledge can be transferred from seen to unseen activities by using semantic similarity. The evaluation conducted on two data sets extracted from the well-known CASAS datasets show that the proposed zero-shot learning approach achieves a high performance in recognizing unseen (i.e., not present in the training dataset) new activities.

Indexed as

Human ActivitiesActivities of Daily LivingAlgorithmsEquipment DesignHumansMachine LearningMonitoring, AmbulatoryNeural Networks, ComputerPattern Recognition, AutomatedReproducibility of ResultsSupport Vector Machineactivity recognitionnon-visual sensorssensor datazero-shot learning

Identifiers

PMID32033072
PMCPMC7038698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.