Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32033006›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2020

Effect of High Intensity Interval Training Compared to Continuous Training on Cognitive Performance in Young Healthy Adults: A Pilot Study.

Said Mekari, Meghan Earle, Ricardo Martins, Sara Drisdelle, Melanie Killen, Vicky Bouffard-Levasseur, Olivier Dupuy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Increasing the health span: unique role for exercise.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2025
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Said MekariDepartment of Kinesiology, Acadia University, Wolfville, NS B4P 2R6, Canada.
Meghan EarleDepartment of Kinesiology, Acadia University, Wolfville, NS B4P 2R6, Canada.
Ricardo MartinsDepartment of Kinesiology, Acadia University, Wolfville, NS B4P 2R6, Canada.
Sara DrisdelleDepartment of Kinesiology, Acadia University, Wolfville, NS B4P 2R6, Canada.
Melanie KillenDepartment of Kinesiology, Acadia University, Wolfville, NS B4P 2R6, Canada.
Vicky Bouffard-LevasseurSector of Education and Kinesiology, University of Moncton, Edmundston Campus, Edmundston, NB E3V 2S8, Canada.
Olivier DupuyLaboratory MOVE (EA 6314), Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Poitiers, 17000 Poitiers, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7273-8272

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To improve cognitive function, moving the body is strongly recommended; however, evidence regarding the proper training modality is still lacking. The purpose of this study was therefore to assess the effects of high intensity interval training (HIIT) compared to moderate intensity continuous exercise (MICE), representing the same total training load, on improving cognitive function in healthy adults. It was hypothesized that after 6 weeks (3 days/week) of stationary bike training, HIIT would improve executive functions more than MICE. Twenty-five participants exercised three times a week for 6 weeks after randomization to the HIIT or MICE training groups. Target intensity was 60% of peak power output (PPO) in the MICE group and 100% PPO in the HIIT group. After training, PPO significantly increased in both the HIIT and MICE groups (9% and 15%,

Indexed as

cognitionexercise physiologyexercise traininghigh intensity interval trainingmoderate intensity continuous exercise

Identifiers

PMID32033006
PMCPMC7071608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.