Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32032755›Full record

ArticleJournal of structural biology2020

Direct comparison of optical and electron microscopy methods for structural characterization of extracellular vesicles.

Jade M Noble, LaDeidra Monét Roberts, Netta Vidavsky, Aaron E Chiou, Claudia Fischbach, Matthew J Paszek, Lara A Estroff, Lena F Kourkoutis

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of structural biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Outer membrane vesicles secreted byInfection and immunity · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. 3D cryoimaging of cell-mediated cholesterol crystal clearance in human atherosclerotic lesions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jade M NobleRobert Frederick Smith School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
LaDeidra Monét RobertsNancy E. and Peter C. Meinig School of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Netta VidavskyDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Aaron E ChiouNancy E. and Peter C. Meinig School of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Claudia FischbachNancy E. and Peter C. Meinig School of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA; Kavli Institute at Cornell for Nanoscale Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Matthew J PaszekRobert Frederick Smith School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA; Kavli Institute at Cornell for Nanoscale Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. Electronic address: paszek@cornell.edu.
Lara A EstroffDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA; Kavli Institute at Cornell for Nanoscale Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. Electronic address: lae37@cornell.edu.
Lena F KourkoutisSchool of Applied and Engineering Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA; Kavli Institute at Cornell for Nanoscale Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. Electronic address: lena.f.kourkoutis@cornell.edu.
Cornell University · US

Funding

Project 3: Physical and Metabolic Constraints of Cancer Cell InvasionU54CA210184 · NCI · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI CERIONE, RICHARD A. · 2016 to 2020
$10.2M
Mechanobiology of the Cellular GlycocalyxDP2GM119133 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI PASZEK, MATTHEW J · 2015 to 2015
$2.3M
Broad wavelength range Zeiss 780 NLO/confocal system for the Cornell Imaging CoreS10OD018516 · OD · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI ZIPFEL, WARREN R · 2014 to 2014
$834k
Zeiss LSM710 Confocal Microscope for Shared Imaging FacilityS10RR025502 · NCRR · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAMS, REBECCA M · 2009 to 2009
$500k
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA210184NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR025502NIGMS NIH HHS DP2 GM119133NIH HHS S10 OD018516
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As interest in the role of extracellular vesicles in cell-to-cell communication has increased, so has the use of microscopy and analytical techniques to assess their formation, release, and morphology. In this study, we evaluate scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and cryo-SEM for characterizing the formation and shedding of vesicles from human breast cell lines, parental and hyaluronan synthase 3-(HAS3)-overexpressing MCF10A cells, grown directly on transmission electron microscopy (TEM) grids. While cells imaged with conventional and cryo-SEM exhibit distinct morphologies due to the sample preparation process for each technique, tubular structures protruding from the cell surfaces were observed with both approaches. For HAS3-MCF10A cells, vesicles were present along the length of membrane protrusions. Once completely shed from the cells, extracellular vesicles were characterized using nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) and cryo-TEM. The size distributions obtained by each technique were different not only in the range of vesicles analyzed, but also in the relative proportion of smaller-to-larger vesicles. These differences are attributed to the presence of biological debris in the media, which is difficult to differentiate from vesicles in NTA. Furthermore, we demonstrate that cryo-TEM can be used to distinguish between vesicles based on their respective surface structures, thereby providing a path to differentiating vesicle subpopulations and identifying their size distributions. Our study emphasizes the necessity of pairing several techniques to characterize extracellular vesicles.

Indexed as

Cell CommunicationCryoelectron MicroscopyExosomesExtracellular VesiclesFemaleGlycocalyxHumansMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionBreast cancerCellular communicationCryo-scanning electron microscopyCryo-transmission electron microscopyExosomesExtracellular vesiclesGlycocalyxMicrovesiclesNanoparticle tracking analysis

Identifiers

PMID32032755
PMCPMC7067680
OpenAlexW3004570579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.