Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32032724›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Surgeons2020

Oncologic Safety and Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.

Julie A Margenthaler, Connie Gan, Yan Yan, Amy E Cyr, Marissa Tenenbaum, Diana Hook, Terence M Myckatyn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Robotic-Assisted Nipple Sparing Mastectomy.Seminars in plastic surgery · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Oncological Outcomes of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in an Unselected Population Evaluated in a Single Center.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. The Language of Implant-based Breast Reconstruction: Can We Do Better?Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Risk-reducing surgery inTranslational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Julie A MargenthalerDepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO. Electronic address: jmargenthaler@wustl.edu.
Connie GanDepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
Yan YanDepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
Amy E CyrDepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
Marissa TenenbaumDepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
Diana HookDepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
Terence M MyckatynDepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
American College of Surgeons · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Washington University Center for Cellular ImagingP30CA091842 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TIMOTHY J. EBERLEIN · 2001 to 2026
$128.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA091842
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is an alternative to skin-sparing mastectomy in appropriately selected patients. The aim of this study was to review our experience with NSM and to evaluate for oncologic safety. STUDY

designPatients who underwent NSM at our institution from September 2008 through August 2017 were identified after IRB approval. Data included patient age, tobacco use, tumor size, hormone receptor status, lymph node status, radiation and chemotherapy use, incision type, and reconstruction type. Statistical analyses were performed using ANOVA and chi-square tests.

resultsThere were 322 patients who underwent 588 NSM (83% bilateral, 17% unilateral), including 399 (68%) for malignancy (Stage 0 [27%], I [44%], II [25%] and III [4%]). The overall rate of wound complication was 18.9%. Tobacco use increased complication (37.5% vs 16.3%, p < 0.001), as did adjuvant radiation therapy (31.4% vs 17.4%, p = 0.014). Patients with lymph node involvement and larger tumor size had a higher rate of complication (31.3% vs 17.2%, p = 0.016). Patients undergoing circumareolar incisions had a higher rate of complication than those undergoing lateral radial, inframammary fold, or curvilinear incisions (43.5% vs 17.4% vs 17.4% vs 14.3%, respectively, p = 0.018). Six (1%) local chest wall recurrences occurred during the follow-up period, none of which involved the nipple-areolar complex. Four patients (1%) suffered a distant recurrence.

conclusionsMost NSM performed at our institution are in patients with malignancy. The oncologic safety is confirmed by the low locoregional recurrence rate. Tobacco use and adjuvant radiation therapy remain the most significant risk factors for complication, highlighting the need for careful patient selection and patient counseling regarding modifiable risk factors and expected outcomes.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMastectomy, SubcutaneousMiddle AgedNipplesOrgan Sparing TreatmentsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32032724
PMCPMC13517086
OpenAlexW3005346570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.