Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32032641›Full record

Trial reportContraception2020

Birth Control Connect: A randomized trial of an online group to disseminate contraceptive information.

Christine Dehlendorf, Edith Fox, Anjana E Sharma, Jingwen Zhang, Sijia Yang, Damon Centola

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Contraception, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Contraceptive content shared on social media: an analysis of Twitter.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Attitudes Toward the Copper IUD in Sweden: A Survey Study.Frontiers in global women's health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christine DehlendorfUniversity of California, San Francisco, Department of Family & Community Medicine, Person-Centered Reproductive Health Program, 1001 Potrero Ave., San Francisco, CA 94110, USA; University of California, San Francisco, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, & Reproductive Sciences, 1001 Potrero Ave., San Francisco, CA 94110, USA; University of California, San Francisco, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, 1001 Potrero Ave., San Francisco, CA 94110, USA. Electronic address: christine.dehlendorf@ucsf.edu.
Edith FoxUniversity of California, San Francisco, Department of Family & Community Medicine, Person-Centered Reproductive Health Program, 1001 Potrero Ave., San Francisco, CA 94110, USA. Electronic address: edith.fox@ucsf.edu.
Anjana E SharmaUniversity of California, San Francisco, Department of Family & Community Medicine, Person-Centered Reproductive Health Program, 1001 Potrero Ave., San Francisco, CA 94110, USA. Electronic address: anjana.sharma@ucsf.edu.
Jingwen ZhangUniversity of Pennsylvania, Annenberg School for Communication, Network Dynamics Group, 3620 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; University of California, Davis, Department of Communication, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA. Electronic address: jwzzhang@ucdavis.edu.
Sijia YangUniversity of Pennsylvania, Annenberg School for Communication, Network Dynamics Group, 3620 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Electronic address: sijia.yang@asc.penn.edu.
Damon CentolaUniversity of Pennsylvania, Annenberg School for Communication, Network Dynamics Group, 3620 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Electronic address: dcentola@asc.penn.edu.
University of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Institutional Career Development Core SupplementKL2TR001870 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KANAYA, ALKA M., SARKAR, URMIMALA · 2016 to 2025
$19.7M
Sci-Tech Core-Population Dynamics Research CenterP2CHD044964 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Xi Song · 2018 to 2026
$5.3M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001870NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD044964
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe sought to test whether participation in an online group including IUD users influenced IUD-related knowledge, attitudes, and behavior among IUD non-users, as a proof-of-concept evaluation of information dissemination for less commonly used or novel contraceptives. STUDY

designWe conducted a blinded, randomized controlled trial on the effect of online communication with IUD users within an online program called Birth Control Connect. Participants were women age 18-45 living in the United States who had never used an IUD. We invited participants randomized to the intervention to join two-week, nine-member discussion groups including four satisfied IUD users and five IUD non-users; we invited control participants to groups including nine IUD non-users. We performed chi-squared tests on IUD knowledge, information-seeking, informational support and use in immediate post-surveys, and t-tests comparing change in IUD attitudes and frequency of logins to discussion groups.

resultsWe invited 488 IUD non-users and enrolled them into 70 groups between October 2015 and April 2016. We found increased positive attitudes towards the IUD in the intervention arm (0.65-point increase between pre- and post-surveys, versus 0.05 mean change for control arm, p = 0.03 for hormonal IUD, with a trend in the same direction for the non-hormonal IUD). Informational support also increased, with 70.3% of intervention arm participants self-reporting that they gained a better idea of what the IUD would be like, compared to 51.3% in control arm (p < 0.01). Of intervention participants, 63.3% versus 51.3% of control participants reported gaining new information from their group (p = 0.03). There were no differences in correct responses to knowledge items or information-seeking between groups.

conclusionsOnline exposure to IUD users increased positive attitudes toward the IUD and informational support for decision-making about the IUD among non-users. IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT: Online spaces provide a promising environment for the exchange of accurate, useful contraceptive information based on real user experiences. Interventions aiming to harness social communication through structured online conversations (e.g., on existing social media platforms) about user experiences with lesser-known contraceptive methods such as the IUD may be worthwhile.

Indexed as

Pregnancy, UnplannedAdolescentAdultContraceptionContraceptive Agents, FemaleFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInternetIntrauterine Devices, MedicatedMiddle AgedPregnancySelf ReportUnited StatesYoung AdultContraceptive Agents, FemaleCommunicationContraceptionInternetIUDOnlineSocial

Identifiers

PMID32032641
PMCPMC7234911
OpenAlexW3004548977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.