Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32032582›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychologia2020

What not to look for: Electrophysiological evidence that searchers prefer positive templates.

Jason Rajsic, Nancy B Carlisle, Geoffrey F Woodman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychologia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Effort expectation and strategic cue use in visual search.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Assessing recoding accounts of negative attentional templates using behavior and eye tracking.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Attentional priority is determined by predicted feature distributions.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jason RajsicDepartment of Psychology, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, NE1 8SG, UK. Electronic address: jason.rajsic@northumbria.ac.uk.
Nancy B CarlisleDepartment of Psychology, College of Arts and Sciences, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, 18015, USA.
Geoffrey F WoodmanDepartment of Psychology, Center for Integrative and Cognitive Neuroscience, and Interdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA.

Funding

Shop Module CoreP30EY008126 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Kevin L Schey · 1989 to 2026
$19.6M
Visual Event-Related Potentials: Comparative ElectrophysiologyR01EY019882 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI WOODMAN, GEOFFREY F · 2010 to 2020
$4.0M
Restoring oscillations underlying adaptive control in schizophrenia with direct currentR01MH110378 · NIMH · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI PARK, SOHEE, WOODMAN, GEOFFREY F · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
Controlling visual cognition with visual working memory and long-term memoryR01EY025275 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI LOGAN, GORDON DENNIS, WOODMAN, GEOFFREY F · 2015 to 2018
$1.4M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY008126NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019882NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025275NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH110378
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To-be-attended information can be specified either with positive cues (I'll be wearing a blue shirt) or with negative cues (I won't be wearing a red shirt). Numerous experiments have found that positive cues help search more than negative cues. Given that negative cues produce smaller benefits compared to positive cues, it stands to reason that searchers may choose to use positive templates instead of negative templates if given the opportunity. Here, we evaluate this possibility with behavioral measures as well as by directly measuring the formation of positive and negative templates with event-related potentials. Analysis of the contralateral delay activity (CDA) elicited by cues revealed that positive and negative templates relied on working memory to the same extent, even when negative working memory templates could have been circumvented by relying on long-term memories of target colors. Whereas the CDA did not discriminate positive and negative templates, a CNV-like potential did, suggesting cognitive differences between positive and negative templates beyond visual working memory. However, when both positive and negative information were presented in each cue, participants preferred to make use of the positive cues, as indicated by a CDA contralateral to the positive color in negative cue blocks, and a lack of search benefits for positive- and negative-color cues relative to positive-color cues alone. Our results show that searchers elect to selectively encode only positive information into visual working memory when both positive and negative information are available.

Indexed as

AttentionMemory, Long-TermMemory, Short-TermCuesEvoked PotentialsHumansVisual PerceptionAttentionEvent-related potentialsVisual searchWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID32032582
PMCPMC9335948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.