ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2020
CATCH: Characterizing and Tracking Colloids Holographically Using Deep Neural Networks.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-Time 3D Tracking of Multi-Particle in the Wide-Field Illumination Based on Deep Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Real-time 3D tracking of swimming microbes using digital holographic microscopy and deep learning.PloS one · 2024Article
- Article
- Multi-angle holographic characterization of individual fractal aggregates.Optics express · 2022Article
- Deep learning in light-matter interactions.Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany) · 2022Review
- 3D monitoring of the surface slippage effect on micro-particle sedimentation by digital holographic microscopy.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Fast and Accurate Nanoparticle Characterization Using Deep-Learning-Enhanced Off-Axis Holography.ACS nano · 2021Article
- Interpreting holographic molecular binding assays with effective medium theory.Biomedical optics express · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In-line holographic microscopy provides an unparalleled wealth of information about the properties of colloidal dispersions. Analyzing one colloidal particle's hologram with the Lorenz-Mie theory of light scattering yields the particle's three-dimensional position with nanometer precision while simultaneously reporting its size and refractive index with part-per-thousand resolution. Analyzing a few thousand holograms in this way provides a comprehensive picture of the particles that make up a dispersion, even for complex multicomponent systems. All of this valuable information comes at the cost of three computationally expensive steps: (1) identifying and localizing features of interest within recorded holograms, (2) estimating each particle's properties based on characteristics of the associated features, and finally (3) optimizing those estimates through pixel-by-pixel fits to a generative model. Here, we demonstrate an end-to-end implementation that is based entirely on machine-learning techniques. Characterizing and Tracking Colloids Holographically (CATCH) with deep convolutional neural networks is fast enough for real-time applications and otherwise outperforms conventional analytical algorithms, particularly for heterogeneous and crowded samples. We demonstrate this system's capabilities with experiments on free-flowing and holographically trapped colloidal spheres.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.