ReviewBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2020
Key novelties in the evolution of the aquatic colonial phylum Bryozoa: evidence from soft body morphology.
Review in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Why Some Bryozoans Poop Themselves: A Novel Defecation Method in Ctenostome Bryozoans.Journal of morphology · 2026Article
- Morphological character evolution and ancestral state reconstruction in phylactolaemate bryozoans.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Fusion, fission, and scrambling of the bilaterian genome in Bryozoa.Genome research · 2025Article
- Ecology of endolithic bryozoans: colony development, growth rates and interactions of species in the genus Immergentia.Zoological letters · 2024Article
- Rediscovering the unusual, solitary bryozoan Monobryozoon ambulans Remane, 1936: first molecular and new morphological data clarify its phylogenetic position.Frontiers in zoology · 2024Article
- Deep-sea ctenostome bryozoans: revision of the family Pachyzoidae, with description of a new genus and three new species from Zealandia.Zoological letters · 2024Article
- Digging into boring bryozoans: new characters and new species of Immergentiidae.Organisms, diversity & evolution · 2024Article
- Embodied Computational Evolution: A Model for Investigating Randomness and the Evolution of Morphological Complexity.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Article
- Multiple evolutionary transitions of reproductive strategies in a phylum of aquatic colonial invertebrates.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023Article
- The unplumatellid Plumatella fruticosa found its home: Hirosella gen. nov. morphological arguments for the systematic placement of a freshwater bryozoan.Journal of morphology · 2023Article
- Boring bryozoans: an investigation into the endolithic bryozoan family Penetrantiidae.Organisms, diversity & evolution · 2023Article
- Morphology of ctenostome bryozoans: 6. Amphibiobeania epiphylla.Journal of morphology · 2022Article
- Phylogenomics reveals deep relationships and diversification within phylactolaemate bryozoans.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022Article
- Reconstructing the neuromuscular ground pattern of phylactolaemate bryozoans: new data from the Lophopodidae.BMC ecology and evolution · 2022Article
- Brachiopod and mollusc biomineralisation is a conserved process that was lost in the phoronid-bryozoan stem lineage.EvoDevo · 2022Article
- Morphology of ctenostome bryozoans: 5. Sundanella, with description of a new species from the Western Atlantic and the Multiporata concept.Journal of morphology · 2022Article
- Composite branch construction by dual autozooidal budding modes in hornerids (Bryozoa: Cyclostomatida).Journal of morphology · 2022Article
- The epithelial layers of the body wall in hornerid bryozoans (Stenolaemata: Cyclostomatida).Journal of morphology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Molecular techniques are currently the leading tools for reconstructing phylogenetic relationships, but our understanding of ancestral, plesiomorphic and apomorphic characters requires the study of the morphology of extant forms for testing these phylogenies and for reconstructing character evolution. This review highlights the potential of soft body morphology for inferring the evolution and phylogeny of the lophotrochozoan phylum Bryozoa. This colonial taxon comprises aquatic coelomate filter-feeders that dominate many benthic communities, both marine and freshwater. Despite having a similar bauplan, bryozoans are morphologically highly diverse and are represented by three major taxa: Phylactolaemata, Stenolaemata and Gymnolaemata. Recent molecular studies resulted in a comprehensive phylogenetic tree with the Phylactolaemata sister to the remaining two taxa, and Stenolaemata (Cyclostomata) sister to Gymnolaemata. We plotted data of soft tissue morphology onto this phylogeny in order to gain further insights into the origin of morphological novelties and character evolution in the phylum. All three larger clades have morphological apomorphies assignable to the latest molecular phylogeny. Stenolaemata (Cyclostomata) and Gymnolaemata were united as monophyletic Myolaemata because of the apomorphic myoepithelial and triradiate pharynx. One of the main evolutionary changes in bryozoans is a change from a body wall with two well-developed muscular layers and numerous retractor muscles in Phylactolaemata to a body wall with few specialized muscles and few retractors in the remaining bryozoans. Such a shift probably pre-dated a body wall calcification that evolved independently at least twice in Bryozoa and resulted in the evolution of various hydrostatic mechanisms for polypide protrusion. In Cyclostomata, body wall calcification was accompanied by a unique detachment of the peritoneum from the epidermis to form the hydrostatic membraneous sac. The digestive tract of the Myolaemata differs from the phylactolaemate condition by a distinct ciliated pylorus not present in phylactolaemates. All bryozoans have a mesodermal funiculus, which is duplicated in Gymnolaemata. A colonial system of integration (CSI) of additional, sometimes branching, funicular cords connecting neighbouring zooids via pores with pore-cell complexes evolved at least twice in Gymnolaemata. The nervous system in all bryozoans is subepithelial and concentrated at the lophophoral base and the tentacles. Tentacular nerves emerge intertentacularly in Phylactolaemata whereas they partially emanate directly from the cerebral ganglion or the circum-oral nerve ring in myolaemates. Overall, morphological evidence shows that ancestral forms were small, colonial coelomates with a muscular body wall and a U-shaped gut with ciliary tentacle crown, and were capable of asexual budding. Coloniality resulted in many novelties including the origin of zooidal polymorphism, an apomorphic landmark trait of the Myolaemata.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.