Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32032375›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2020

Primary care interventions to address physical frailty among community-dwelling adults aged 60 years or older: A meta-analysis.

Stephen H-F Macdonald, John Travers, Éidín Ní Shé, Jade Bailey, Roman Romero-Ortuno, Michael Keyes, Diarmuid O'Shea, Marie Therese Cooney

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. [PAPPS update on older people 2024].Atencion primaria · 2024
    Guideline
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Temporalis muscle biomarkers from routine brain MRI and risk of dementia in two independent cohorts.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Group-based trajectories of potentially preventable hospitalisations among older adults after a hip fracture.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Stephen H-F MacdonaldSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-6306-8035
John TraversSchool of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Éidín Ní ShéSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Jade BaileySchool of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Roman Romero-OrtunoDiscipline of Medical Gerontology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Michael KeyesSt Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Diarmuid O'SheaSt Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Marie Therese CooneySt Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
University College Dublin · IESt. Vincent's University Hospital · IETrinity College Dublin · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe best interventions to address frailty among older adults have not yet been fully defined, and the diversity of interventions and outcome measures makes this process challenging. Consequently, there is a lack of guidance for clinicians and researchers regarding which interventions are most likely to help older persons remain robust and independent. This paper uses meta-analysis to assess effectiveness of primary care interventions for physical frailty among community-dwelling adults aged 60+ and provides an up-to-date synthesis of literature in this area.

methodsPubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, and PEDro databases were searched, and RCTs, controlled pilot studies, or trials with similar study designs addressing frailty in the primary care setting among persons aged 60+ were chosen. Study data was abstracted following PRISMA guidelines, then meta-analysis was performed using the random effects model.

results31 studies with a total of 4794 participants were analysed. Interventions using predominantly resistance-based exercise and nutrition supplementation seemed to improve frailty status versus control (RR = 0.62 (CI 0.48-0.79), I2 = 0%). Exercise plus nutrition education also reduced frailty (RR = 0.69 (CI 0.58-0.82), I2 = 0%). Exercise alone seemed effective in reducing frailty (RR = 0.63 (CI 0.47-0.84), I2 = 0%) and improving physical performance (RR = 0.43 (CI 0.18-0.67), I2 = 0%). Exercise alone also appeared superior to control in improving gait speed (SMD = 0.36 (CI 0.10-0.61, I2 = 74%), leg strength (SMD = 0.61 (CI 0.09-1.13), I2 = 87%), and grip strength (Mean Difference = 1.08 (CI 0.02-2.15), I2 = 71%) though a high degree of heterogeneity was observed. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (RR = 0.77 (CI 0.64-0.93), I2 = 0%) also seemed superior to control in reducing frailty.

conclusionExercise alone or with nutrition supplementation or education, and comprehensive geriatric assessment, may reduce physical frailty. Individual-level factors and health systems resource availability will likely determine configuration of future interventions.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsExerciseAgedFrailtyGaitGeriatric AssessmentHand StrengthHumansPrimary Health CareRisk

Identifiers

PMID32032375
PMCPMC7006935
OpenAlexW3005327399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.