Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32032365›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Effects of food properties on chewing in pigs: Flexibility and stereotypy of jaw movements in a mammalian omnivore.

Stéphane J Montuelle, Rachel A Olson, Hannah Curtis, Sophia Beery, Susan H Williams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Kinematics of Proal Chewing in Rats.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Article
  4. Three-dimensional kinematics of leaf-cutter ant mandibles: not all dicondylic joints are simple hinges.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  5. Characterizing tongue deformations during mastication using changes in planar components of three-dimensional angles.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Regional Tongue Deformations During Chewing and Drinking in the Pig.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stéphane J MontuelleDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Warrensville Heights, Ohio, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8638-9779
Rachel A OlsonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio, United States of America.
Hannah CurtisDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Athens, Ohio, United States of America.
Sophia BeeryDepartment of Biological Sciences, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio, United States of America.
Susan H WilliamsDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Athens, Ohio, United States of America.

Funding

Effect of lingual nerve injury on oromotor functionR15DE023668 · NIDCR · OHIO UNIVERSITY ATHENS · PI WILLIAMS, SUSAN H · 2014 to 2014
$446k
NIDCR NIH HHS R15 DE023668
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chewing is a rhythmic oral behavior that requires constant modifications of jaw movements in response to changes in food properties. The food-specific kinematic response is dependent on the potential for kinematic flexibility allowed by morphology and modulation of motor control. This study investigates the effects of food toughness and stiffness on the amplitude and variability of jaw movements during chewing in a typical omnivorous mammalian model (pigs). Jaw movements were reconstructed using X-ray Reconstruction Of Moving Morphology (XROMM) and kinematic data associated with the amplitude of jaw pitch (opening-closing) and jaw yaw (mediolateral rotation) were extracted for each cycle. Between-food differences were tested for the amplitude of jaw movements during each phase of the gape cycle, as well as in their respective within-food variability, or stereotypy, as indicated by coefficients of variation. With increasing toughness, jaw pitch amplitude is decreased during fast close, larger and more stereotyped during slow close, smaller but more variable during slow open, and more variable during fast open. In addition, when chewing on tougher foods, the amplitude of jaw yaw during slow close only increases in a subset of individuals, but all become less variable (i.e., more stereotyped). In contrast, increasing food stiffness has no effect on the amplitude or the variability of jaw pitch, whereas jaw yaw increases significantly in the majority of individuals studied. Our data demonstrate that food stiffness and toughness both play a role in modulating gape cycle dynamics by altering the trajectory of jaw movements, especially during the slow-close phase and tooth-food-tooth contact, albeit differently. This highlights how a generalist oral morphology such as that of pigs (e.g., bunodont teeth lacking precise occlusion, permissive temporomandibular joint allowing extensive condylar displacements in 3 dimensions) enables organisms to not only adjust chewing movements in their amplitude, but also in their variability.

Indexed as

Animal FeedMasticationAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaFeeding BehaviorJawMovementSwineTooth

Identifiers

PMID32032365
PMCPMC7006907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.