Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32032258›Full record

ReviewRetina (Philadelphia, Pa.)2020

CURRENT CONCEPTS AND MODALITIES FOR MONITORING THE FELLOW EYE IN NEOVASCULAR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION: An Expert Panel Consensus.

Tien Yin Wong, Paolo Lanzetta, Francesco Bandello, Bora Eldem, Rafael Navarro, Monica Lövestam-Adrian, Anat Loewenstein

Open access · hybridAbstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Bilateral choroidal thinning during unilateral aflibercept for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: 5-year mixed-effects analysis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. [Real-life results of anti-VEGF treatment in fellow eyes with nAMD].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Anti-VEGF intravitreal injections in the era of COVID-19: responding to different levels of epidemic pressure.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Guidance for anti-VEGF intravitreal injections during the COVID-19 pandemic.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Tien Yin WongSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Paolo LanzettaDepartment of Medicine-Ophthalmology, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Francesco BandelloDepartment of Ophthalmology, Vita-Salute University, Scientific Institute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Bora EldemDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Rafael NavarroRetina and Vitreous Department, Institute of Ocular Microsurgery, Barcelona, Spain.
Monica Lövestam-AdrianDepartment of Ophthalmology, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; and.
Anat LoewensteinDivision of Ophthalmology, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Hacettepe University · TRInstituto de Microcirugía Ocular · ESLund University · SENational University of Singapore · SGTel Aviv University · ILUniversity of Udine · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe presence of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in one eye is a major risk factor for the development of disease in the fellow eye. Several methods exist to help physicians monitor the fellow eye, with new technologies becoming increasingly available.

methodsWe provide an overview of modalities for nAMD monitoring, including advances in home-based options, and review their utility for fellow-eye monitoring, based on a review of the literature and a consensus of retinal experts.

resultsStudies demonstrate the importance of early detection of nAMD in the fellow eye so that interventions can be made before significant vision loss occurs. A series of techniques exist for the early detection of nAMD including chart-based methods and imaging devices. The increased availability of home-based methods has presented an opportunity for patients to monitor their vision at home.

conclusionFrequent monitoring of the fellow eye in patients with unilateral nAMD is of critical importance to prevent vision loss and maintain quality of life. Patients should be examined every 3 to 4 months from the time of choroidal neovascularization diagnosis and encouraged to monitor their vision at home using home-based technologies where available, to provide the best opportunity for early detection.

Indexed as

ChoroidFluorescein AngiographyFundus OculiHumansMacula LuteaMonitoring, PhysiologicTomography, Optical CoherenceWet Macular Degeneration

Identifiers

PMID32032258
PMCPMC7099845
OpenAlexW3004775732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.