Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32032225›Full record

ArticleEar and hearing

Effect of Cochlear Implantation on Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials and Wideband Acoustic Immittance.

Gabrielle R Merchant, Kyli M Schulz, Jessie N Patterson, Denis Fitzpatrick, Kristen L Janky

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ear and hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Effects of Middle-ear Stiffness on the Auditory Brainstem Neural Encoding of Phase.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Bone conducted vibration is an effective stimulus for otolith testing in cochlear implant patients.Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Objective vestibular function changes in children following cochlear implantation.Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation · 2022
    Article
  17. Does vestibular loss result in cognitive deficits in children with cochlear implants?Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gabrielle R MerchantBoys Town National Research Hospital, Department of Research, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Kyli M SchulzBoys Town National Research Hospital, Department of Research, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Jessie N PattersonBoys Town National Research Hospital, Department of Audiology, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Denis FitzpatrickBoys Town National Research Hospital, Department of Research, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Kristen L JankyBoys Town National Research Hospital, Department of Audiology, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Boys Town National Research Hospital · US

Funding

The Impact of Mild Hearing Loss on Auditory Perception in Complex EnvironmentsP20GM109023 · NIGMS · FATHER FLANAGAN'S BOYS' HOME · PI LEIBOLD, LORI J. · 2014 to 2023
$23.4M
Short-Term Research Training for AuD StudentsT35DC008757 · NIDCD · FATHER FLANAGAN'S BOYS' HOME · PI Kristen L. Janky · 2007 to 2026
$683k
OUTCOMES IN PEDIATRIC VESTIBULAR LOSSR03DC015318 · NIDCD · FATHER FLANAGAN'S BOYS' HOME · PI JANKY, KRISTEN L. · 2016 to 2018
$450k
NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC015318NIDCD NIH HHS T35 DC008757NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe objective of this study was to determine if absent air conduction stimuli vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) responses found in ears after cochlear implantation can be the result of alterations in peripheral auditory mechanics rather than vestibular loss. Peripheral mechanical changes were investigated by comparing the response rates of air and bone conduction VEMPs as well as by measuring and evaluating wideband acoustic immittance (WAI) responses in ears with cochlear implants and normal-hearing control ears. The hypothesis was that the presence of a cochlear implant can lead to an air-bone gap, causing absent air conduction stimuli VEMP responses, but present bone conduction vibration VEMP responses (indicating normal vestibular function), with changes in WAI as compared with ears with normal hearing. Further hypotheses were that subsets of ears with cochlear implants would (a) have present VEMP responses to both stimuli, indicating normal vestibular function and either normal or near-normal WAI, or (b) have absent VEMP responses to both stimuli, regardless of WAI, due to true vestibular loss.

designTwenty-seven ears with cochlear implants (age range 7 to 31) and 10 ears with normal hearing (age range 7 to 31) were included in the study. All ears completed otoscopy, audiometric testing, 226 Hz tympanometry, WAI measures (absorbance), air conduction stimuli cervical and ocular VEMP testing through insert earphones, and bone conduction vibration cervical and ocular VEMP testing with a mini-shaker. Comparisons of VEMP responses to air and bone conduction stimuli, as well as absorbance responses between ears with normal hearing and ears with cochlear implants, were completed.

resultsAll ears with normal hearing demonstrated 100% present VEMP response rates for both stimuli. Ears with cochlear implants had higher response rates to bone conduction vibration compared with air conduction stimuli for both cervical and ocular VEMPs; however, this was only significant for ocular VEMPs. Ears with cochlear implants demonstrated reduced low-frequency absorbance (500 to 1200 Hz) as compared with ears with normal hearing. To further analyze absorbance, ears with cochlear implants were placed into subgroups based on their cervical and ocular VEMP response patterns. These groups were (1) present air conduction stimuli response, present bone conduction vibration response, (2) absent air conduction stimuli response, present bone conduction vibration response, and (3) absent air conduction stimuli response, absent bone conduction vibration response. For both cervical and ocular VEMPs, the group with absent air conduction stimuli responses and present bone conduction vibration responses demonstrated the largest decrease in low-frequency absorbance as compared with the ears with normal hearing.

conclusionsBone conduction VEMP response rates were increased compared with air-conduction VEMP response rates in ears with cochlear implants. Ears with cochlear implants also demonstrate changes in low-frequency absorbance consistent with a stiffer system. This effect was largest for ears that had absent air conduction but present bone conduction VEMPs. These findings suggest that this group, in particular, has a mechanical change that could lead to an air-bone gap, thus, abolishing the air conduction VEMP response due to an alteration in mechanics and not a true vestibular loss. Clinical considerations include using bone conduction vibration VEMPs and WAI for preoperative and postoperative testing in patients undergoing cochlear implantation.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationVestibular Evoked Myogenic PotentialsVestibule, LabyrinthAcousticsAcoustic StimulationAdolescentAdultBone ConductionChildHumansYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32032225
PMCPMC7392788
OpenAlexW3005149095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.