ArticleEar and hearing
Effect of Cochlear Implantation on Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials and Wideband Acoustic Immittance.
Article in Ear and hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- American Academy of Audiology Clinical Consensus Statement: Assessment of Vestibular Function in the Pediatric Population.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology · 2025Guideline
- The effect of cochlear implant surgery on vestibular function in adults: A meta-analysis study.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Pooled it
- Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials and Wideband Acoustic Immittance as Screening Tools for Large Vestibular Aqueduct Syndrome.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology · 2025Observational
- Effect of Cochlear Implantation on Air Conduction and Bone Conduction Elicited Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials-A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Advancements in Pediatric Audiological Assessments Using Wideband Acoustic Immittance: A Review.Audiology research · 2024Review
- Electrode Montage for Bilateral Cervical Vestibular-Evoked Myogenic Potential Testing.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology · 2024Article
- Article
- Bone Conduction Cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials as an Alternative in Children with Middle Ear Effusion.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Stability of Vestibular Testing in Children With Hearing Loss.American journal of audiology · 2022Article
- The Effects of Middle-ear Stiffness on the Auditory Brainstem Neural Encoding of Phase.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022Article
- Changes in Acoustic Absorbance Pre- and Post-Cochlear Implantation.American journal of audiology · 2022Article
- Effects of aging on ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential using ER-3A insert earphone and B81 bone vibrator.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Bone conducted vibration is an effective stimulus for otolith testing in cochlear implant patients.Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation · 2022Article
- Effect of cochlear implantation on vestibular function in children: A scoping review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- Commentary: The effect of cochlear implant surgery on vestibular function in adults: A meta-analysis study.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Objective vestibular function changes in children following cochlear implantation.Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation · 2022Article
- Does vestibular loss result in cognitive deficits in children with cochlear implants?Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation · 2022Article
- Alteration of Vestibular Function in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- Diagnosing vestibular hypofunction: an update.Journal of neurology · 2021Review
- Influence of Cochlear Implantation on Vestibular Function in Children With an Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe objective of this study was to determine if absent air conduction stimuli vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) responses found in ears after cochlear implantation can be the result of alterations in peripheral auditory mechanics rather than vestibular loss. Peripheral mechanical changes were investigated by comparing the response rates of air and bone conduction VEMPs as well as by measuring and evaluating wideband acoustic immittance (WAI) responses in ears with cochlear implants and normal-hearing control ears. The hypothesis was that the presence of a cochlear implant can lead to an air-bone gap, causing absent air conduction stimuli VEMP responses, but present bone conduction vibration VEMP responses (indicating normal vestibular function), with changes in WAI as compared with ears with normal hearing. Further hypotheses were that subsets of ears with cochlear implants would (a) have present VEMP responses to both stimuli, indicating normal vestibular function and either normal or near-normal WAI, or (b) have absent VEMP responses to both stimuli, regardless of WAI, due to true vestibular loss.
designTwenty-seven ears with cochlear implants (age range 7 to 31) and 10 ears with normal hearing (age range 7 to 31) were included in the study. All ears completed otoscopy, audiometric testing, 226 Hz tympanometry, WAI measures (absorbance), air conduction stimuli cervical and ocular VEMP testing through insert earphones, and bone conduction vibration cervical and ocular VEMP testing with a mini-shaker. Comparisons of VEMP responses to air and bone conduction stimuli, as well as absorbance responses between ears with normal hearing and ears with cochlear implants, were completed.
resultsAll ears with normal hearing demonstrated 100% present VEMP response rates for both stimuli. Ears with cochlear implants had higher response rates to bone conduction vibration compared with air conduction stimuli for both cervical and ocular VEMPs; however, this was only significant for ocular VEMPs. Ears with cochlear implants demonstrated reduced low-frequency absorbance (500 to 1200 Hz) as compared with ears with normal hearing. To further analyze absorbance, ears with cochlear implants were placed into subgroups based on their cervical and ocular VEMP response patterns. These groups were (1) present air conduction stimuli response, present bone conduction vibration response, (2) absent air conduction stimuli response, present bone conduction vibration response, and (3) absent air conduction stimuli response, absent bone conduction vibration response. For both cervical and ocular VEMPs, the group with absent air conduction stimuli responses and present bone conduction vibration responses demonstrated the largest decrease in low-frequency absorbance as compared with the ears with normal hearing.
conclusionsBone conduction VEMP response rates were increased compared with air-conduction VEMP response rates in ears with cochlear implants. Ears with cochlear implants also demonstrate changes in low-frequency absorbance consistent with a stiffer system. This effect was largest for ears that had absent air conduction but present bone conduction VEMPs. These findings suggest that this group, in particular, has a mechanical change that could lead to an air-bone gap, thus, abolishing the air conduction VEMP response due to an alteration in mechanics and not a true vestibular loss. Clinical considerations include using bone conduction vibration VEMPs and WAI for preoperative and postoperative testing in patients undergoing cochlear implantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.