ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2020
Model Comparison Metrics Require Adaptive Correction if Parameters Are Discretized: Proof-of-Concept Applied to Transient Signals in Dynamic PET.
Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modeling PET Data Acquired During Nonsteady Conditions: What If Brain Conditions Change During the Scan?Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2024Review
- Novel voxelwise residual analysis of [Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2024Article
- Assessment of transient dopamine responses to smoked cannabis.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2021Article
- Detecting and classifying neurotransmitter signals from ultra-high sensitivity PET data: the future of molecular brain imaging.Physics in medicine and biology · 2021Article
- Methods for Quantifying Neurotransmitter Dynamics in the Living Brain With PET Imaging.Frontiers in physiology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Linear parametric neurotransmitter PET (lp-ntPET) is a novel kinetic model that estimates the temporal characteristics of a transient neurotransmitter component in PET data. To preserve computational simplicity in estimation, the parameters of the nonlinear term that describe this transient signal are discretized, and only a limited set of values for each parameter are allowed. Thus, linear estimation can be performed. Linear estimation is implemented using predefined basis functions that incorporate the discretized parameters. The implementation of the model using discretized parameters poses unique challenges for significance testing. Significance testing employs model comparison metrics to determine the significance of the improvement of the fit accomplished by including a basis function, i.e. it determines the presence of a transient signal in the PET data. A false positive occurs when the bases overfit data that do not contain a transient component. The number of parameters in a model, p, is necessary to determine the degrees of freedom in the model. In turn, p is crucial for the calculation of model selection metrics and controlling the false positive rate (FPR). In this work, we first explore the effect of parameter discretization on FPR by fitting simulated null data with varying numbers of bases. We demonstrate the dependence of FPR on number of bases. Then, we propose a correction to the number of parameters in the model, p
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.