Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32031765›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie2020

Evaluating the utility of computed tomography of the chest for gastric cancer staging

Jordan Nostedt, Lindsay Gibson-Brokop, Sunita Ghosh, Michael Seidler, Michael McCall, Daniel Schiller

Open access · diamondAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A prospective Canadian gastroesophageal cancer database: What have we learned?Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jordan NostedtFrom the Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. (Nostedt, McCall, Schiller); the Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. (Gibson-Brokop); the Department of Medical Oncology and the Department of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. (Ghosh); and the Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. (Seidler).
Lindsay Gibson-BrokopFrom the Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. (Nostedt, McCall, Schiller); the Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. (Gibson-Brokop); the Department of Medical Oncology and the Department of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. (Ghosh); and the Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. (Seidler).
Sunita GhoshFrom the Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. (Nostedt, McCall, Schiller); the Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. (Gibson-Brokop); the Department of Medical Oncology and the Department of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. (Ghosh); and the Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. (Seidler).
Michael SeidlerFrom the Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. (Nostedt, McCall, Schiller); the Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. (Gibson-Brokop); the Department of Medical Oncology and the Department of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. (Ghosh); and the Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. (Seidler).
Michael McCallFrom the Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. (Nostedt, McCall, Schiller); the Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. (Gibson-Brokop); the Department of Medical Oncology and the Department of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. (Ghosh); and the Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. (Seidler).
Daniel SchillerFrom the Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. (Nostedt, McCall, Schiller); the Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. (Gibson-Brokop); the Department of Medical Oncology and the Department of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. (Ghosh); and the Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. (Seidler).
University of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: International guidelines recommend routine computed tomography (CT) of the chest for gastric cancer staging. In Asian countries, where the incidence of pulmonary metastases is less than 1%, some guidelines recommend chest CT only for gastroesophageal junction cancers. If the incidence of pulmonary metastases is also low in Canada, routine chest CT may not be beneficial. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients in northern Alberta with newly diagnosed gastric cancer from January 2010 to July 2016. The primary aim of the study was to determine the incidence of pulmonary metastases at the time of diagnosis in this population. A secondary aim was to identify potential predictors of pulmonary metastases. We reviewed CT reports for pulmonary metastases. Imaging data also included liver metastases, abdominal lymphadenopathy (> 1 cm), ascites and omental or peritoneal nodules. Other data recorded were age, sex, primary tumour location, histologic type and tumour grade. Results: Four hundred and sixty-two patients (311 men, 151 women) were included in the analysis. Pulmonary metastases were identified in 25 patients (5.4%) overall and in 11 of 299 patients (3.7%) whose primary cancer was not in the cardia. On univariate analysis the presence of liver metastases (odds ratio [OR] 7.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.24–18.37, p < 0.001) and abdominal lymphadenopathy (OR 3.30, 95% CI 1.29–8.48, p = 0.01) was associated with an increased risk of pulmonary metastases. Liver metastases retained statistical significance on multivariate analysis (OR 6.17, 95% CI 2.53–15.03, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The incidence of pulmonary metastases at the time of gastric cancer diagnosis is higher in northern Alberta than previously reported in Asian studies. Abdominal lymphadenopathy and liver metastases confer an elevated risk of pulmonary metastases.

Indexed as

RegistriesAdultAgedAlbertaFemaleHumansLiver NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsLymphadenopathyMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPredictive Value of TestsRadiography, ThoracicRetrospective StudiesRisk

Identifiers

PMID32031765
PMCPMC7828934
OpenAlexW3009430946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.