Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32031761›Full record

ArticleMicrobiologyOpen2020

Limited diagnostic possibilities for bloodstream infections with broad-range methods: A promising PCR/electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry platform is no longer available.

Jan Tkadlec, Eliska Bebrova, Jan Berousek, Tomas Vymazal, Jaroslava Adamkova, Vendula Martinkova, Claus Moser, Dragos Florea, Pavel Drevinek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MicrobiologyOpen, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jan TkadlecDepartment of Medical Microbiology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-0892-924X
Eliska BebrovaDepartment of Medical Microbiology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jan BerousekDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Tomas VymazalDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jaroslava Adamkova3rd Department of Surgery, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Vendula Martinkova3rd Department of Surgery, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Claus MoserDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Dragos FloreaNational Institute for Infectious Diseases, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, Bucharest, Romania.
Pavel DrevinekDepartment of Medical Microbiology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-8994-5240

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fast and accurate detection of causative agents of bloodstream infections remains a challenge of today's microbiology. We compared the performance of cutting-edge technology based on polymerase chain reaction coupled with electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (PCR/ESI-MS) with that of conventional broad-range 16S rRNA PCR and blood culture to address the current diagnostic possibilities for bloodstream infections. Of 160 blood samples tested, PCR/ESI-MS revealed clinically meaningful microbiological agents in 47 samples that were missed by conventional diagnostic approaches (29.4% of all analyzed samples). Notably, PCR/ESI-MS shortened the time to positivity of the blood culture-positive samples by an average of 34 hr. PCR/ESI-MS technology substantially improved current diagnostic tools and represented an opportunity to make bloodstream infections diagnostics sensitive, accurate, and timely with a broad spectrum of microorganisms covered.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBacteremiaFemaleHumansMaleMicrobiological TechniquesMiddle AgedMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesPolymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of ResultsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSepsisSpectrometry, Mass, Electrospray IonizationYoung AdultRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S PCRbloodstream infectionsbroad-range PCRmolecular diagnosticsPCR/ESI-MS

Identifiers

PMID32031761
PMCPMC7221429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.