ArticleeLife2020
How the brain represents mass.
Article in eLife, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Object representations in human ventral and dorsal cortex depend on display format and physical distance.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025Article
- A study on brain neuronal activation based on the load in upper limb exercise (STROBE).Medicine · 2022Article
- Graspability Modulates the Stronger Neural Signature of Motor Preparation for Real Objects vs. Pictures.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
New fMRI experiments and machine learning are helping to identify how the mass of objects is processed in the brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.